2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluative judgment across domains: Liking balance, contour, symmetry and complexity in melodies and visual designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
65
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
9
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the differences in the visual assessment of beauty may be related to the peculiarities of each artistic category. These results are consistent with Clemente et al [82], who found stimuli modality-specific (visual/auditory) effects on evaluative judgments. Moreover, musicians often have a high affinity to symmetrical features, as these are essential to organize the tempo of a melody [5,106].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the differences in the visual assessment of beauty may be related to the peculiarities of each artistic category. These results are consistent with Clemente et al [82], who found stimuli modality-specific (visual/auditory) effects on evaluative judgments. Moreover, musicians often have a high affinity to symmetrical features, as these are essential to organize the tempo of a melody [5,106].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We included random intercepts and slopes within participants and intercepts within stimuli as random effects. Following Clemente et al [82], we extracted individual slope estimates from the random-effects structure of LMMs as a measure of aesthetic sensitivity-the extent to which a particular sensory feature affects someone's aesthetic valuation [92]-to facial asymmetry for each participant. In this case, negative slope values indicate lower preference for facial asymmetry, which is expected for most participants, whereas positive values indicate greater preference for facial asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Activation in parts of the DMN (orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortex) reflect a domaingeneral pattern of neural connectivity associated with aesthetic appreciation (Belfi et al, 2019;Vessel, Isik, Belfi, Stahl, & Starr, 2019), corresponding to pleasure in different art domains such as images (Vartanian & Goel, 2004), music (Ishizu & Zeki, 2011), and architectural spaces (Vartanian et al, 2013). Despite domain-general reward processing, similar elemental features (e.g., balance, complexity, symmetry) in different art forms are not equally liked, suggesting that the sensory-motor system may differentially interact with the emotion-valuation system depending on the modality of the artwork (Clemente, Pearce, Skov, & Nadal, 2021).…”
Section: Aesthetic Cognitivism Review 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Openness to experience, more than any other personality trait, is linked to aesthetic appreciation and cognition (DeYoung, 2015). People higher in openness to experience tend to know more about art (Atari, Afhami, & Mohammadi-Zarghan, 2020), make different interest-confusion appraisals (Fayn et al, 2019;Silvia, 2010), appreciate AESTHETIC COGNITIVISM REVIEW 21 compositional attributes (Clemente et al, 2021), and are more likely to have profound experiences (e.g., awe, wonder, curiosity;Fayn, MacCann, Tiliopoulos, & Silvia, 2015;Pelowski, Markey et al, 2017;Silvia, Fayn, Nusbaum, & Beaty, 2015).…”
Section: Dispositionmentioning
confidence: 99%