2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-007-9038-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluations of Unionized College and University Faculty: A Review of the Laws

Abstract: This article identifies key issues and provides administrative and faculty guidance on legal matters pertaining to unionized professors' evaluations. To do so, the authors trail the fact patterns of a series of cases on evaluations of unionized faculty that have emerged over the last 30 years-with an emphasis on the cases from the last decade.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in both Canada and the United States faculty unions and associations, as well as national organizations like the AAUP and CAUT, sought to ensure tenure was secured through collective bargaining, these efforts have been sustained more effectively within the Canadian environment. In many American states (including North Carolina, Texas and Virginia) unionization has been outlawed or highly regulated, restricting the ability of faculty to form associations that can engage in bargaining with university management (Sun & Permuth, 2007). Additionally, a number of institutions across the United States have either abandoned tenure or modified it to a point that it no longer resembles the structure it once was.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While in both Canada and the United States faculty unions and associations, as well as national organizations like the AAUP and CAUT, sought to ensure tenure was secured through collective bargaining, these efforts have been sustained more effectively within the Canadian environment. In many American states (including North Carolina, Texas and Virginia) unionization has been outlawed or highly regulated, restricting the ability of faculty to form associations that can engage in bargaining with university management (Sun & Permuth, 2007). Additionally, a number of institutions across the United States have either abandoned tenure or modified it to a point that it no longer resembles the structure it once was.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Penner (1994) argues, 63 Dobbie & Robinson (2008) note that many non-tenure track faculty (part-time and/or full-time) have also unionized in Canada and the United States. 64 According to Sun & Permuth [2007] the rate of unionized faculty at public institutions is significantly higher at approximately 94%. This statistic is based on 2006 data from the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions (NCSCBHEP) and is quoted in Sun & Permuth (2007, p. 117).…”
Section: Collective Bargaining Unionization and Faculty Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, universities emphasized the commercialization of academic research products and processes. Furthermore, like many other situations in higher education, the legal structure opened the door for expressions of new preferences and interests, and bargaining, balancing, and leveraging took place (see also Pusser, 2004;Sun and Permuth, 2007). Third, as technology advanced, research increased.…”
Section: Chapter Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%