Teaching has always been and remains a core function of universities. However, there is a pervasive assumption that research activity is privileged over teaching contributions, particularly when hiring, tenure and promotion decisions are being made. Where do such beliefs come from? Are these assumptions based on policy or practice, or a combination of the two? Is research privileged, and if so, does teaching really matter? This dissertation considers the assumption that teaching is My good fortune continued throughout my doctoral studies as I worked with my supervisor Professor Glen Jones. His ongoing support, attention to detail and thorough feedback ensured that my experience and the writing of my dissertation was rigorous but also humane! I am truly appreciative of the guidance and mentorship Professor Jones provided throughout the entire process. My thanks go out also to the members of my committee: Professors Sandra Acker and Elizabeth Smyth. I am grateful to both Professors Acker and Smyth for challenging my thinking and my assumptions and for pushing me out of my comfort zone! Also, my sincere thanks to Professors Daniel Pratt and Edith Hillan for providing such valuable feedback on my dissertation during the final stages. I must also acknowledge the ongoing support of my family and friends. I was fortunate to be raised in a family where education was valued and its pursuit was encouraged and I am grateful for the support that each and every one of the members of my immediate and extended family has provided. In particular, I would like to thank my sister-in-law and friend Kathleen, for her unwavering support and her willingness to listen. And finally, to my husband, David MacKinnon, you have been by my side as I have completed each of my degrees-without your love and constant encouragement I would not have made it through! I reserve my deepest gratitude and my eternal love for you. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. List of Appendices ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Chapter 1-Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. Organization of the Study …………………………………………………………………………………….………… Chapter 2-Review of the Literature …………………………………………………………………………….. The Formalization of Tenure ………………………………………………………………………………………….. The pros and cons of tenure: scholarly debates …………………………………………………… Reforming tenure ………………………………………………………………………………………………… Impact of Tenure on Academic Work: Teaching and Research ……………………………………….. Teaching and the Evaluation of Teaching: Perceptions, Policies and Practice …………………. Emphasizing Teaching in Higher Education …………………………………………………………………….. Faculty Development Initiatives in Canada and Abroad ………………………………………………….. Impact of faculty development initiatives on teaching practice, institutional cultures and policies ……………………………………………………………………………………………. Effective Teaching Evaluation Frameworks: Recommendations from ...