Proceedings of 2011 IEEE CIE International Conference on Radar 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cie-radar.2011.6159939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluations of keystone transforms using several interpolation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we should make a tradeoff between the computational burden and precision. In our paper, the sinc-interpolation is used because of its robustness and desirable performance [5], [35], [36].…”
Section: ) Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we should make a tradeoff between the computational burden and precision. In our paper, the sinc-interpolation is used because of its robustness and desirable performance [5], [35], [36].…”
Section: ) Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been devised aiming at reducing the computational load of the KT slow-time resampling stage with respect to a conventional SCI [17][21][24] [25].…”
Section: Alternative Slow-time Interpolation Methods and Adopted Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, possible application of the P-LPI for the active radar case has been preliminary investigated in [25] while only the case of a linear interpolation (namely a 1-LPI) has been recently considered for the PR case in [17].…”
Section: Alternative Slow-time Interpolation Methods and Adopted Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations