2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluations of emotions: Distinguishing between affective, behavioral and cognitive components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that two boredom beliefs-good or bad, and functional or not-were postulated from the literature review, the result of a three-factor solution may look surprising at first glance. However, our findings align with Netzer et al (2018)'s proposition that attitudes towards emotions are comprised of affective, behavioural, and cognitive components. Boredom functionality appears to be a behavioural component, which concerns the extent to which people recognize the functions of boredom, such as "Boredom motivates me to make changes or adjustments" and "Boredom allows me to distinguish things that are truly meaningful to me."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Given that two boredom beliefs-good or bad, and functional or not-were postulated from the literature review, the result of a three-factor solution may look surprising at first glance. However, our findings align with Netzer et al (2018)'s proposition that attitudes towards emotions are comprised of affective, behavioural, and cognitive components. Boredom functionality appears to be a behavioural component, which concerns the extent to which people recognize the functions of boredom, such as "Boredom motivates me to make changes or adjustments" and "Boredom allows me to distinguish things that are truly meaningful to me."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Other studies have shown that inducing positive beliefs about the functionality of specific emotional states (e.g., anxiety) or features (e.g., physiological arousal) promotes recovery from stressful situations (Low et al, 2008;Jamieson et al, 2010Jamieson et al, , 2012John-Henderson et al, 2015), and wellbeing (Chow and Berenbaum, 2016). The fact that negative emotions can be viewed as useful shows that people's beliefs about the functionality of emotion do not simply reflect how they want to feel (Chow et al, 2015), or how pleasurable they perceive certain feelings to be (Netzer et al, 2018). In general, then, valuing specific emotions, or specific features of emotion, tends to be associated with better outcomes than viewing them as dysfunctional (Brooks, 2014;De Castella et al, 2014;Veilleux et al, 2015;Crum et al, 2017;Ford et al, 2018).…”
Section: Lay Beliefs About the Functionality Of Specific Emotional Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while beliefs about the experience and expression of negative emotion may not directly predict future depressive symptoms in early adolescence, such beliefs may predict future depressive symptoms via an indirect mechanism. For example, emotion acceptability beliefs have demonstrated associations with increased reliance on avoidance‐based emotion regulation strategies in adulthood (Harmon‐Jones, Harmon‐Jones, Amodio, & Gable, 2011; Sydenham et al., 2017; Tran & Rimes, 2017) and are purported to play a driving role in emotion regulation strategy use (Netzer, Gutentag, Kim, Solak, & Tamir, 2018). It may be that such beliefs indirectly predict future depressive symptoms in mid‐to‐late adolescence via an overreliance on emotion suppression and other avoidance‐based strategies as a means of downregulating emotion in order to achieve relevant goals (e.g., peer acceptance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%