2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation use and involvement of internal stakeholders: The case of a new non-degree online program in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contemporary times, Stake's model has sustained its rigor and utility. For instance, responsive approaches can be integrated with other theories for a more profound judgment of program quality (Cornachione et al 2010). In nursing education, Joseph and Juwah (2012) used this model in evaluating outcomes-based curriculum and instruction.…”
Section: The Need For a Cpd Curriculum Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contemporary times, Stake's model has sustained its rigor and utility. For instance, responsive approaches can be integrated with other theories for a more profound judgment of program quality (Cornachione et al 2010). In nursing education, Joseph and Juwah (2012) used this model in evaluating outcomes-based curriculum and instruction.…”
Section: The Need For a Cpd Curriculum Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The market would regulate itself, however it would take time. Personally, I was involved in several evaluation studies in Brazil, including programmes in private organizations (Cornacchione, Trombetta, and Casa Nova 2010). Many of my graduate students (yes, I supervise graduate students on Evaluation in my Department of Accounting and Actuarial Sciences) developed relevant studies bringing evaluation perspectives (recently, Ms. Sheizi Freitas was in the United States for 1 year as a Fulbright Scholar with professor Jennifer Greene at UIUC).…”
Section: Human Resource Development International 225mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, of course, multiple levels and types of participation, as the planning literature has pointed out (e.g., Arnstein, 1969;Green, 2010;Wondolleck, Manring, & Crowfoot, 1996) and recent work on stakeholder involvement in evaluation has increasingly recognized (e.g., Cornachione, Trombetta, & Cas Nova, 2010;Plottu & Plottu, 2009). Arnstein's (1969) classic article on the ladder of citizen participation distinguishes eight levels ranging from a disguised form of manipulation by elites at the bottom to full-scale citizen control at the top.…”
Section: Participatory and Stakeholder-based Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%