2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00456-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation on speciation and removal efficiencies of mercury from municipal solid waste incinerators in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, mercury is the most volatile species among various trace metals, and major portions of it can pass through an existing air pollution control system (APCS) unless it is adsorbed onto particulate matter (PM) and collected or removed by PM control devices (Klein et al, 1975). Several methods of controlling mercury emissions are either in commercial use or under development for MWCs and MWIs (Brna and Kilgroe, 1990;Chang et al, 2000). Dry sorbent injection (DSI) of activated carbon followed by fabric filtration (FF) has shown consistently high (Ͼ90%) mercury removal in MWC applications (Brna and Kilgroe, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, mercury is the most volatile species among various trace metals, and major portions of it can pass through an existing air pollution control system (APCS) unless it is adsorbed onto particulate matter (PM) and collected or removed by PM control devices (Klein et al, 1975). Several methods of controlling mercury emissions are either in commercial use or under development for MWCs and MWIs (Brna and Kilgroe, 1990;Chang et al, 2000). Dry sorbent injection (DSI) of activated carbon followed by fabric filtration (FF) has shown consistently high (Ͼ90%) mercury removal in MWC applications (Brna and Kilgroe, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spray drying (SD) followed by FFs and electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and two-stage acid gas wet scrubbers (WS) have also been found to remove substantial (60-90%) amounts of mercury in MWCs (Brna and Kilgroe, 1990). However, a recent study conducted by Chang et al (2000) in two MWCs in Taiwan indicated a substantially lower removal of mercury. In this study, unit A, equipped with dry sorbent injection (DSI, lime injection) followed by FF, showed a mercury removal of 30%, and unit B, equipped with ESP/WS, exhibited a mercury removal of 45%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogeneous nucleation results in the formation of small particles (<1 µm) from the gas phase, while ash formation yields large particles resulting in an enrichment of metals. These two mechanisms of particulate matter (PM) formation operate concurrently, and the rates of the reactions are related to the boiling points of the heavy metals, the combustion temperature and the amounts of chloride and sulphur in MW (Wichmann et al, 2000;Bakoglu et al, 2003;Chang et al, 2000;Yuan, 2005).…”
Section: Flue Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…injection with FF as the main control technology for mercury removal. 3,8,11,12 The effectiveness of PAC injection in removing vapor-phase mercury depends on the types and composition of burned materials, flue gas composition and temperature, mercury speciation, PAC properties and injection rate, and operating conditions. 13 Moreover, activated carbon impregnated with sulfur is considered as an alternative adsorbent for raising the removal efficiency of vapor-phase mercury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%