The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of δ13C and δ15N Uncertainties Associated with the Compound-Specific Isotope Analysis of Geoporphyrins

Abstract: Compound-specific isotope analyses of geoporphyrins, which are derivatives of chloropigments possessed by phototrophs, provide essential records of the biogeochemical cycle of past aquatic environments. Here, we evaluated uncertainties in carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions (δ13C and δ15N) associated with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purification and isotopic measurements of geoporphyrins. Evaluation of total blank carbon and nitrogen for the HPLC and our sensitivity-improved elemental a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number represents the average of analytical errors (1 sigma) of various inhouse synthesized maleimide injections (also see Chikaraishi et al, 2008). The δ 15 N values of these maleimides were independently determined at JAMSTEC on an EA/IRMS (described in Isaji et al, 2020) that was calibrated with IAEA authentic standards. Methyl-isobutyl-maleimides were below the limit of reliable analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This number represents the average of analytical errors (1 sigma) of various inhouse synthesized maleimide injections (also see Chikaraishi et al, 2008). The δ 15 N values of these maleimides were independently determined at JAMSTEC on an EA/IRMS (described in Isaji et al, 2020) that was calibrated with IAEA authentic standards. Methyl-isobutyl-maleimides were below the limit of reliable analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotopic compositions and quantities of carbon were determined using a nano‐EA/IRMS system consisting of a modified elemental analyzer (Flash EA1112, ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA, USA), a continuous flow interface (ConFloIII, ThermoFinnigan) and an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Delta plus XP, ThermoFinnigan), following the protocol reported by Ogawa et al 27 An aliquot of the AA was transferred into tin capsules. All the tin capsules were solvent rinsed (dichloromethane and methanol, 1:1, v/v) to remove contaminants from the surface 28 . The AA samples were transferred to the capsules and dried at 95°C on a hot plate before analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the measurements of total carbon and nitrogen contents and their isotopic compositions, we used an automated EA/IRMS system (Flash EA1112 elemental analyzer/Conflo III interface/Delta Plus XP isotoperatio mass spectrometer, Thermo Finnigan Co., Bremen) at Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), which was modified to improve the sensitivity for small sample analysis (>100 ngN, >500 ngC; Ogawa et al 2010;Isaji et al 2020). This analysis was conducted at the same time by the same methods as our previous measurement of the carbonaceous clast in the Zag meteorite (Kebukawa et al 2020).…”
Section: Bulk Carbon and Nitrogen Contents And Their Isotopic Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%