1949
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100010008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Yield Potentialities of Oat Crosses From Bulk Hybrid Tests1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
4

Year Published

1955
1955
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is fully recognised that pests and diseases may cause severe losses in certain areas, seasons or genotypes. These losses may seriously confound the results obtained, so that there is little correlation over generations and years for the yields of the crosses, for example ATKINS & MURPHY (1949) suffered an attack of Helminthosporium victoriae in their oats and FOWLER & HEYNE (1955) suffered from both soil borne mosaic and very localised drought in their wheat experiments. Varieties or crosses that are genetically low yielding, but which have a measure of resistance to pests and diseases, as might occur in wild, weedy or primitive types, may perform better in stress situations than varieties or crosses of high yield potential but no resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is fully recognised that pests and diseases may cause severe losses in certain areas, seasons or genotypes. These losses may seriously confound the results obtained, so that there is little correlation over generations and years for the yields of the crosses, for example ATKINS & MURPHY (1949) suffered an attack of Helminthosporium victoriae in their oats and FOWLER & HEYNE (1955) suffered from both soil borne mosaic and very localised drought in their wheat experiments. Varieties or crosses that are genetically low yielding, but which have a measure of resistance to pests and diseases, as might occur in wild, weedy or primitive types, may perform better in stress situations than varieties or crosses of high yield potential but no resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith and Lambert (12) reported that performance of parents and early generation bulks of their crosses was reliable in predicting the yield of F 5 lines of spring barley. However, Fowler and Heyne (4) working with wheat, Atkins and Murphy (2) with oats, and Weiss, Weber, and Kalton (13) with soybeans questioned the predictive value of F 2 and Fa generation tests. Allard (1) reviewed early generation test results and concluded that selection for yield among crosses could be made in early generations but selection of lines within a cross could not be made in early generations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the gene interaction mentioned, the cultural value (phenotype) of a heterozygous plant is not a reliable guide to the value of the lines which may be derived from it . In fact plants that might segregate valuable gene combinations after selfing, could easily get lost, if plants, dominant or intermediate for some detrimental genes, are eliminated from highly heterozygous populations by means of phenotypic selections (1,4,9) . 3 …”
Section: Genetics and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%