2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4809-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of WSD Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores were calculated using the standard coverage, precision, recall, and F-score measures as used in word sense disambiguation (Palmer et al, 2007):…”
Section: Task Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores were calculated using the standard coverage, precision, recall, and F-score measures as used in word sense disambiguation (Palmer et al, 2007):…”
Section: Task Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IAA in Senseval-2 Verb Lexical Sample by expert annotators (Palmer et al, 2006) is 71% and in Senseval-3 by Contributors over the Web (Mihalcea et al, 2004) IAA is 67.3% with a Macro Average-K of 0.35. However in these tasks the IAA was computed somewhat differently (Palmer et al, 2006…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it does not really give a large improvement in performance as compared to the strategy of choosing most frequent senses, see Palmer et al (2006) and Sec. 8.2 for more details.…”
Section: Axioms Derived From Wordnetmentioning
confidence: 99%