Evaluation of WRF-Predicted Near-Hub-Height Winds and Ramp Events over a Pacific Northwest Site with Complex Terrain

Abstract

One challenge with wind-power forecasts is the accurate prediction of rapid changes in wind speed (ramps). To evaluate the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model's ability to predict such events, model simulations, conducted over an area of complex terrain in May 2011, are used. The sensitivity of the model's performance to the choice among three planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes [Mellor-Yamada-Janji c (MYJ), University of Washington (UW), and Yonsei University (YSU)] is investigated. The simulated nearhub-height winds (62 m), vertical wind speed profiles, and ramps are evaluated against measurements obtained from tower-mounted anemometers, a Doppler sodar, and a radar wind profiler deployed during the Columbia Basin Wind Energy Study (CBWES). The predicted winds at near-hub height have nonnegligible biases in monthly mean under stable conditions. Under stable conditions, the simulation with the UW scheme better predicts upward ramps and the MYJ scheme is the most successful in simulating downward ramps. Under unstable conditions, simulations using the YSU and UW schemes show good performance in predicting upward ramps and downward ramps, with the YSU scheme being slightly better at predicting ramps with durations longer than 1 h. The largest differences in mean wind speed profiles among simulations using the three PBL schemes occur during upward ramps under stable conditions, which were frequently associated with low-level jets. The UW scheme has the best overall performance in ramp prediction over the CBWES site when evaluated using prediction accuracy and capture-rate statistics, but no single PBL parameterization is clearly superior to the others when all atmospheric conditions are considered.

Observing and Simulating the Summertime Low-Level Jet in Central Iowa

“…Finally, rapid increases or decreases of wind speeds in the rotor-layer have been connected to low-level jets in modeling studies (Deppe et al 2013). These events, known as ramps, can complicate the integration of variable wind farm power output into the electricity grid (Bossavy et al 2013;Yang et al 2013). The combined abilities of the V1 and 200S lidar allow us to observe jets and ramp events simultaneously.…”

Australian National Electricity Market Model - Version 1.10

“…WRF physics scheme configurations were chosen based on those found optimal for wind modelling (Deppe, Gallus & Takle 2012;Santos-Alamillos et al 2013;Yang et al 2013;Zhang, Pu & Zhang 2013) and suitable for Australian environmental conditions (Evans, Ekström & Ji 2012). The main physics scheme selections being: Each month model run included a two day prior spin-up time to equalise model dynamics and a model run time-step of 45 seconds was set.…”

Evaluation of Single-Doppler Radar Wind Retrievals in Flat and Complex Terrain

“…The RWP was supplied by the U.S. Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Climate Research Facility (Mather and Voyles 2013;Stokes and Schwartz 1994). All of these instruments were deployed in close proximity to one another (Berg et al 2012;Yang et al 2013).…”