2015
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.613155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Working Memory in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Abstract: Purpose: Evaluate the auditory and visual components of working memory in 60 students of both genders. The students were divided into two groups: an experimental group (EG) comprising 30 children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and a control group (CG) consisting of 30 children with neither attention deficits nor learning disabilities. The study found that EG exhibited lower performance than CG. A comparison of two types of working memory: auditory and visual indicated that subjects with A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual differences in the development of VWM are predictive of subsequent academic achievements such as math abilities (Bull, Espy, & Wiebe, 2008) and reading comprehension (Swanson and Berninger, 1996). Capacity limitations in VWM have also been linked to various developmental disorders including autism (Alloway et al, 2016) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (Ferreira et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual differences in the development of VWM are predictive of subsequent academic achievements such as math abilities (Bull, Espy, & Wiebe, 2008) and reading comprehension (Swanson and Berninger, 1996). Capacity limitations in VWM have also been linked to various developmental disorders including autism (Alloway et al, 2016) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (Ferreira et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only one study has examined the effects of phonological similarity on working memory performance of children with ADHD. de Lima Ferreira et al (2015) examined the effects of phonologically and analogous interference effects and found that both the ADHD and control groups exhibited greater difficulty in recall for phonologically similar words (e.g., lata, pata, mata). Performance of the ADHD group, however, was disproportionately negatively affected by the phonological similarity effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%