Evaluation of work posture and quantification of fatigue by Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)

Rizkya, I; Syahputri, Khalida; Sari, R M; Anizar,; Siregar, Ikhsan

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/309/1/012051

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and Rapid Entire Body Assessment are the preeminent and easiest tools for rapid ergonomic risk assessment in observational methods to evaluate work-posture [49,58]. RULA provides the level of postural load for the upper limb and REBA for the entire body [53,59]. Other ergonomic assessments, such as the Quick Exposure Checklist and the Strain Index, are also used for ergonomic risk assessment [50,55].…”

Section: Ergonomic Risk Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables in Ergonomic Risk Assessment Using Motion Capture Simulation: A Review

Yunus

Jaafar

Mohamed

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are among the most common disorders in any work sector and industry. Ergonomic risk assessment can reduce the risk of WMSDs. Motion capture that can provide accurate and real-time quantitative data has been widely used as a tool for ergonomic risk assessment. However, most ergonomic risk assessments that use motion capture still depend on the traditional ergonomic risk assessment method, focusing on qualitative data. Therefore, this article aims to provide a view on the ergonomic risk assessment and apply current motion capture technology to understand classical mechanics of physics that include velocity, acceleration, force, and momentum in ergonomic risk assessment. This review suggests that using motion capture technologies with kinetic and kinematic variables, such as velocity, acceleration, and force, can help avoid inconsistency and develop more reliable results in ergonomic risk assessment. Most studies related to the physical measurement conducted with motion capture prefer to use non-optical motion capture because it is a low-cost system and simple experimental setup. However, the present review reveals that optical motion capture can provide more accurate data.

show abstract

Section: Ergonomic Risk Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables in Ergonomic Risk Assessment Using Motion Capture Simulation: A Review

Yunus

Jaafar

Mohamed

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The inputs of REBA include the type of body parts movement, force exertions, coupling measurement, and repetition of the action. REBA is an easy tool to describe the posture and the level of risk (Rizkya et al, 2018). The REBA risk assessment is evaluated using the software ErgoPlus.…”

Section: Rapid Entire Body Assessment (Reba)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ergonomic Evaluation of Maize Seeding using Conventional Method and Lightweight Motorized Maize Seeder

Azmon

Mail²,

Nordin³

et al. 2021

Adv Agric Food Res J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manual activity in maize seeding shows an awkward posture due to repetitive movement on walking forward, body lowering, knee bending, squatting, digging, and seed sowing, which can cause body tiring. These are the symptom of human fatigue or the ergonomic hazard in an agricultural field, leading to Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD) if done repeatedly and extended for a long time. The paper explained the ergonomic evaluation of seeding risk assessment using two methods; bare hand and lightweight motorized maize seeder. The evaluated maize seeder was designed with a minimum number of parts to make the assembly and maintenance requirements easy without affecting the functionality of the metering device. The maize seeder is easy to operate, light to carry, and convenient to use with a single-handed griper to improve ergonomics in the field. Using the concept of gravitational drop and the battery to power the motor, the farmer experiences a slightly bent body position with a relaxed posture that requires less stressful angles on seeding activity. Seeding postures on methods were evaluated using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) to determine the area of bodily discomfort. The RULA result shows that the ergonomic risk score on manual seeding activity was at score 7, which is high risk compared to seeding activity using the maize seeder, which results in a score of 4 that shows a low risk.In comparison, the REBA result shows a high risk on manual seeding with a score of 11 and a low risk on seeding with a seeder, which is in score 3—seeding by bare hand, adopting poor posture at the neck, trunk, and wrist twist. The work rate for seeding maize using the conventional method and seeder was 0.114 m/s and 0.167 m/s, respectively. The study concludes that using the lightweight motorized maize seeder can reduce the risks of MSDs due to working in an awkward posture in sowing maize on the field.

show abstract

“…The workstations modeled in the first stage of the research along with the animated mannequins allowed for the simulation of basic working positions and their evaluation by the REBA method [ 8 , 74 ]. Such an assessment consists of assigning appropriate codes, represented by natural numbers, to the positions of key body segments.…”

Section: Case Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Manufacturing by Digital Human Modeling

Grobelny

Michalski

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research concerns the workplace design methodology, involving digital human models, that prevents work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). We propose an approach that, in conjunction with one of the classic WMSD risk assessment methods, allows one to simplify simulations in a three-dimensional digital environment. Two real-life workstations from a manufacturing industry were modelled in a 3D Studio Max environment by means of an Anthropos ErgoMax system. A number of simulations show that, for the examined cases, classic boundary mannequins’ approaches can be replaced by using 50th percentile of a population individual, with a minimal impact on the WMSD risk. Although, the finding might not be suitable in all situations, it should be considered, especially where compromise solutions are being sought due to other criteria.

show abstract

Evaluation of work posture and quantification of fatigue by Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)

Cited by 10 publications

References 6 publications

Implementation of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables in Ergonomic Risk Assessment Using Motion Capture Simulation: A Review

Implementation of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables in Ergonomic Risk Assessment Using Motion Capture Simulation: A Review

Ergonomic Evaluation of Maize Seeding using Conventional Method and Lightweight Motorized Maize Seeder

Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Manufacturing by Digital Human Modeling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About