2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2009.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of whole-abdominal fat volume by 700-slice CT scanning and comparison with the umbilical fat area anthropometric indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This coincides with the findings of Furukawa et al [10] in Japan and Berker et al [1] in Turkey. In Korea, Yu et al [2] found that, although the average body FM of overweight elementary school boys was higher than that of girls and the average FFM of girls was higher than that of boys, the differences were insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This coincides with the findings of Furukawa et al [10] in Japan and Berker et al [1] in Turkey. In Korea, Yu et al [2] found that, although the average body FM of overweight elementary school boys was higher than that of girls and the average FFM of girls was higher than that of boys, the differences were insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the WHO MONICA study, the degree of overweight was reflected by the WC and not by the WHR. The WC has better sensitivity and utility over WHR as an anthropometric measurement of obesity [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, we found that WC was the only significant indicator of VAT volume in children (beta 5 0.970, p , 0.001). Previous studies 15,29 carried out on adult populations also report that WC is strongly correlated with VAT volume. WC is an easy measurement to perform and can be performed with simple measuring tape or via cross-sectional imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…13 It has been suggested that the gold standard measurement protocol is contiguous CT images from T10-T11 to L5-S1, but owing to time and radiation exposure, measurements are typically performed on a single CT image at L4-L5 or at the level of the umbilicus. [14][15][16] Growing evidence suggests that this may not be the most suitable slice location and that a slice $5 cm above L4-L5 should be used for VAT measurement in adults. 17,18 The single-slice location for VAT quantification used in adults may not be applicable to paediatric patients owing to the varying patterns of fat distribution between children and adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation