2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00100-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of WGEN for generating long term weather data for crop simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the inadequate length (5 yr) of HC1 data, WGEN was used to provide long term weather series for use with CERES-Wheat; WGEN (Richardson & Wright 1984) is a widely used stochastic weather generator that requires mean monthly weather data of T max and T min , precipitation and R g to generate daily weather at a site. There are no significant differences between crop simulation output obtained with WGEN generated and actual weather data (Soltani et al 2000, Hartkamp et al 2003; the latter study also demonstrated the suitability of WGEN for generating adequate long-term time series even when model parameters were derived from relatively short-term (<10 yr) daily weather data.…”
Section: Crop Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…To overcome the inadequate length (5 yr) of HC1 data, WGEN was used to provide long term weather series for use with CERES-Wheat; WGEN (Richardson & Wright 1984) is a widely used stochastic weather generator that requires mean monthly weather data of T max and T min , precipitation and R g to generate daily weather at a site. There are no significant differences between crop simulation output obtained with WGEN generated and actual weather data (Soltani et al 2000, Hartkamp et al 2003; the latter study also demonstrated the suitability of WGEN for generating adequate long-term time series even when model parameters were derived from relatively short-term (<10 yr) daily weather data.…”
Section: Crop Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The output from weather generators is synthetic data, thus it is necessary to investigate the output to assess their representativeness. There are several evaluations of weather generators in the literature: Soltani et al [88] assessed WGEN capabilities. WGEN was found to be representative of both current and future weather.…”
Section: Limitations Of Weather Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several evaluations of weather generators in the literature: Soltani et al. 88 assessed WGEN capabilities. WGEN was found to be representative of both current and future weather.…”
Section: Synthetic Weathermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, short periods of heat stress can be critical (Matsui & Horie 1992;Ferris et al 1998;Vara Prasad et al 2000), but may not be adequately represented in averaged data. Short-time-scale detail is often regenerated from the average GCM and RCM output with 'weather generator' software which uses information on the statistics of weather variability (Soltani et al 2000). The high temporal resolution data produced by the climate models is, therefore, often effectively discarded and then regenerated using statistical techniques.…”
Section: Difficulties With Applying Climate Model Output To Offline Imentioning
confidence: 99%