Evaluation of Wet Mount and Concentration Techniques of Stool Examination for Intestinal Parasites Identification at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia

Abstract

Background Intestinal parasitic infection has serious medical and public health impacts in developing countries. Intestinal parasites were under reported via direct wet mount method due to its poor sensitivity. So, the selection of a more sensitive and reliable diagnostic method is essential. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of wet mount and concentration techniques of stool examination for intestinal parasites identification. Methods A cross-sectional study among 797 pregnant women was conducted from October 2018 to February 2019 at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. The study participants were selected by using a systematic random sampling technique. Stool sample was processed by using Wet Mount (WM) and Formol-Ether Concentration (FEC) techniques. Data was entered into Epi-data version 3.1 and analysis using SPSS version 20.0. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were determined against the combined result as “Gold” standard. Kappa value was determined to estimate the agreement of the diagnostic methods. Results The overall prevalence of intestinal parasites (IP) was 35.2% with a combined method. By using WM and FEC the prevalence of IP was 13.1% and 25.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of WM method were 37.1% and 74.6%, and for FEC method 73.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Test efficiency of direct WM and FEC were 77.9% and 90.7%, respectively. The agreement of WM and FEC techniques with combined technique were moderate (κ=0.434) and perfect (κ=0.783), respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of intestinal parasites was under-reported by wet mount technique. The diagnostic performance of FEC technique for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in pregnant women was notably high as compared to WM technique in the present study. Therefore, the WM and FEC combined method should be used as a routine diagnostic technique for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites identification.

Comparison of Molecular and Parasitological Methods for Diagnosis of Human Trichostrongylosis

“…Our study findings illustrated that the direct wet mount method had very low sensitivity (5.6%) for the diagnosis of trichostrongylosis compared to the other parasitological methods. This is similar to other studies, which demonstrated that the direct wet mount method had a low detection ability for intestinal helminthic infections and may lead to false-negative results ( Mengist et al., 2018 ; Demeke et al., 2021 ).…”

Ethiopia National Food and Nutrition Survey to inform the Ethiopian National Food and Nutrition Strategy: a study protocol

“…Stool samples will be collected using stool cups and stored in 10% formalin to preserve the parasite until analysis. 34 A portion of each stool sample will be used to detect direct ova, larvae and cysts of intestine parasites using formal ether concentration technique. 35 Urine samples will be collected from WRA and school-age children using 60 mL urine cup containers.…”

Waterborne parasites in Uganda: A survey in Queen Elizabeth Protected Area

“…The pellet underwent direct wet smear, xenic cultivation, Ziehl-Neelsen's (ZN) staining, floatation and McMaster techniques to recover and quantify the organisms. Direct wet mount was used mainly for protozoa trophozoites [27]. A small amount of concentrated water pellet was put on a microscope slide, and a drop of iodine was added.…”