Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2695664.2695771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of web accessibility on the maps domain

Abstract: This paper describes the execution of three accessibility evaluations on web-based map applications. Assessments based on expert reviews, tools and end users were performed, using the WCAG 2.0 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) and analyzing its Level A success criteria. To define and set measurable goals, the GQM Approach (Goal-Question-Metric) was utilized. It was found that none of the evaluated applications reaches this level, since they do not entirely meet the analyzed criteria, according to the eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also indicated if multiple image files are used to represent a single map, it creates a mosaic effect and thus inaccessibility ensues. Medina, Cagnin and Paiva [11] have conducted a thorough investigation to determine the accessibility of a few of the most popular web application maps. Their thorough assessment included heuristic expert evaluation, automated evaluation as well as final user testing with users of limited visual ability.…”
Section: Maps Design Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also indicated if multiple image files are used to represent a single map, it creates a mosaic effect and thus inaccessibility ensues. Medina, Cagnin and Paiva [11] have conducted a thorough investigation to determine the accessibility of a few of the most popular web application maps. Their thorough assessment included heuristic expert evaluation, automated evaluation as well as final user testing with users of limited visual ability.…”
Section: Maps Design Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%