2011 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/bmsb.2011.5954960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of video quality metrics on transmission distortions in H.264 coded video

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, the design goal for video quality metrics is to provide good performance across different types of distortions, compression noise and transmission errors in particular. All the well-known objective Full-Reference (FR) video quality metrics, such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM) [32], Video Quality Metric (VQM) [33] and MOVIE [34] have been extensively tested with video sequences including also packet loss artifacts [30], [35]- [38]. There is evidence that many objective FR metrics are not capable to predict the perceptual impact of compression and channel artifacts equally well [35]- [37]; however, the best metrics usually achieve acceptable results in scenarios where different artifacts are present [35], [38].…”
Section: Objective Assessment Of Packet Loss Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the design goal for video quality metrics is to provide good performance across different types of distortions, compression noise and transmission errors in particular. All the well-known objective Full-Reference (FR) video quality metrics, such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM) [32], Video Quality Metric (VQM) [33] and MOVIE [34] have been extensively tested with video sequences including also packet loss artifacts [30], [35]- [38]. There is evidence that many objective FR metrics are not capable to predict the perceptual impact of compression and channel artifacts equally well [35]- [37]; however, the best metrics usually achieve acceptable results in scenarios where different artifacts are present [35], [38].…”
Section: Objective Assessment Of Packet Loss Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various quality measures were proposed and investigated regarding their prediction performance [1], [2], [3], [4]. A lot of studies concentrated on standard definition video material in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the work in this paper is applicable to cases with these conditions, such as, e.g., IPTV cases. This is an extention of the study done in [15]. The databases considered are EPFL-PoliMI (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Politecnico di Milano) video quality assessment database [16][17][18], an HDTV video database made available by IRCCyN [19] and the LIVE Wireless Video Quality Assessment database [20].…”
Section: Video Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%