2012
DOI: 10.22201/icat.16656423.2012.10.4.372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorightms Based on MADM Methods for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

Abstract: In the forthcoming heterogeneous wireless environment, the mobility management of users roaming between different wireless access technologies is a challenging and important technical issue. New mobile devices such as netbooks, smartphones and tablets allow users to perform vertical handoffs among different wireless networks. The multiple attribute decision making (MADM) methods are suitable tools to model and study the vertical handoff process. Hence, recently several MADM methods such as SAW, MEW, TOPSIS, GR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative with the highest rank is selected as the best one as given in (33). In VIKOR [33], the alternatives are ranked according to their closeness to the ideal positive solution (ideal solution is the solution that has the best values for all attributes compared to the other solutions, i.e., alternatives). Fig.3 depicts the computational complexity of the proposed GRA-HO method compared to SAW and VIKOR methods.…”
Section: Performance and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative with the highest rank is selected as the best one as given in (33). In VIKOR [33], the alternatives are ranked according to their closeness to the ideal positive solution (ideal solution is the solution that has the best values for all attributes compared to the other solutions, i.e., alternatives). Fig.3 depicts the computational complexity of the proposed GRA-HO method compared to SAW and VIKOR methods.…”
Section: Performance and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCDM method has been the most widely used for SH for research purposes [26]- [30]. The problems based on MCDM are diverse but share common characteristics, such as, choosing alternatives, multiple DC that describe the alternatives and a set of weights that represent the relative importance for each DC [31]. According to this, MCDM is a mathematical tool adapted to model the SH process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various MCDM methods have been proposed in the literature about SH, such as, SAW [32], [33], TOPSIS [32], [34], MEW [35], [36], GRA [37], [38], ELECTRE [39], Weighted Markov Chain (WMC) [40] and VIKOR [37], [41]. Authors on [31] present an extensive comparative study about the seven MCDM methods previously mentioned. Through simulations in Matlab using random data, they evaluate each method´s performance based on three different applications,: voice, data and cost restrictions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El método VIKOR asume que cada alternativa es evaluada de acuerdo con cada función de criterio, y la clasificación puede ser desarrollada a través de la comparación de las medidas que estén más cercanas a la alternativa ideal (Tanino, Tanaka, & Inuiguchi, 2003). El algoritmo VIKOR sigue los siguientes pasos (E. Stevens-Navarro et al, 2013):…”
Section: )unclassified