1988
DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(88)90004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of venous distension device: Phase II: Cannulation of nonemergent patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of the vacuum device for 30 s resulted in significant increase in venous turgor, but at 60 s use, mild to moderate discomfort and petechiae formation were noted (26). Another study of this vacuum device, in patients who either had no prominent veins or were obese, demonstrated statistically significant success at intravenous cannulation (27). The vacuum device is of simple design and has shown promise in clinical trials, but does not seem to have gained widespread acceptance (2).…”
Section: Venous Distention Devicementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Use of the vacuum device for 30 s resulted in significant increase in venous turgor, but at 60 s use, mild to moderate discomfort and petechiae formation were noted (26). Another study of this vacuum device, in patients who either had no prominent veins or were obese, demonstrated statistically significant success at intravenous cannulation (27). The vacuum device is of simple design and has shown promise in clinical trials, but does not seem to have gained widespread acceptance (2).…”
Section: Venous Distention Devicementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The venous distension device, which creates a vacuum around the arm to augment venous filling, was deemed promising for DIVA in the 1980s [59] but failed to gain traction in popularity following the emergence of ultrasonography as a more definitive adjunct. Another device, Veinplicity, uses electrical stimulation to aid dilation of forearm veins.…”
Section: Venodilation Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various techniques of improving venous prominence and / or locating peripheral veins are (1) proximal application of ordinary rubber venous tourniquet or manual circumferential limb compression (less efficient and uncomfortable), (2) application of sphygmomanometer cuff inflated to just below the diastolic pressure (time-consuming), (3) local warming, [1] (4) Topical nitroglycerine [2] (risk of local skin reaction and headache), (5) ultrasonic guidance [3] (not available in most centers and need skilled personnel) (6) venous distension device. [4] Here, I would like to suggest a different approach to venous cannulation in difficult situations, which has been used successfully in our center with a 100% success rate. The technique involves the placement of a torchlight (flashlight) or a cold light source (for example, the endoscopic light which uses a xenon light source delivered to the tip by fibreoptic bundles and commonly available in operating room settings) under the limb / palm to visualize the veins on the dorsum of hand.…”
Section: Letters To Editormentioning
confidence: 99%