Evaluation of Various Sagittal Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class I Individuals with Different Vertical Facial Growth Types

Türker, Gökhan; Öztürk, Taner; Çoban, Gökhan; Isgandarov, Emin

doi:10.5114/for.2021.107530

Cited by 1 publication

(7 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Turker, Ozturk, Coban and Isgandarov [ 8 ] confirmed the validity of using Yen angle. In high-angle patients, Yen was found to be significantly lower than in low-angle patients and comparable with Pog–Nperp and Wits analysis in relation to beta angle, which was found to be significantly higher in this group.…”

Section: Discussion Of Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…W angle analysis was taken into account by Bhad, Nayak, Doshi [ 13 ], Kumar and Sundareswaran [ 23 ], Ali et al [ 24 ], Shetty et al [ 26 ] and Turker et al [ 8 ].…”

Section: Discussion Of Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… ( a ) The methodology used to select articles in relation to sagittal analysis. ( b ) The methodology used to select articles in relation to horizontal analysis [ 8 ]. …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bhad 2011 [13] Kumar 2012 [12] Kumar 2014 [23] Sonahita, A.; 2014 [14] Hatewar 2015 [15] Ali, S.M. ; 2018 [24] Ahmed 2018 [25] Shetty 2019 [26] Gupta 2020 [6] Jedli ński 2020 [7] Gokhan 2021 [8] A confounding…”

Section: Table 2 (A)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Methods of conducting the cephalometric analysis of lateral head radiographs in twodimensional visualisation have been developed since their pioneering use by Broadbent in the USA and Hofrath in Germany that took place in 1931 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Since then, cephalometric analysis has been one of the basic instruments used routinely in the diagnosis and planning of orthodontic treatment [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

New Sagittal and Vertical Cephalometric Analysis Methods: A Systematic Review

Kotuła

Kuc²,

Lis³

et al. 2022

Diagnostics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cephalometric analysis is an essential tool used in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The main objectives of correct cephalometric analysis include resolving anteroposterior and vertical maxillary and mandibular base discrepancies. For a diagnostic tool to be of value, it should be precise, reliable and reproducible. Unfortunately, according to some studies, the accuracy of input and, therefore, the diagnostic reliability of some of the points and measurements may not be satisfactory. To this end, new cephalometric measurements are being developed with increased precision. In order to properly and definitively determine the usefulness of a given measurement in cephalometric diagnosis, it is necessary to carry out a critical evaluation of available studies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available scientific literature describing new landmarks and reference linear and angular measurements of 2D cephalometric analyses assessing the sagittal and vertical discrepancy in the position of jaw bases since the last systematic review in 2013. The secondary aim was to assess the accuracy and reliability of new anthropometric landmarks and reference planes in relation to those used previously, and their instability in relation to growth and orthodontic tooth movements. To carry out the intended plan, electronic databases such as PubMed, Scholar Google, Web of Science and Pro Quest were searched using specific keywords. Initially, a total of 1451 articles were retrieved. Then, duplicate articles in all databases were excluded from the resulting publications. The results showed that despite such a high number of articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, only 12 studies on new cephalometric analyses in the sagittal plane and 4 studies on new cephalometric analyses in the horizontal plane met the criteria and, as a result, were included in the review.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…W angle analysis was taken into account by Bhad, Nayak, Doshi [ 13 ], Kumar and Sundareswaran [ 23 ], Ali et al [ 24 ], Shetty et al [ 26 ] and Turker et al [ 8 ].…”

Section: Discussion Of Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… ( a ) The methodology used to select articles in relation to sagittal analysis. ( b ) The methodology used to select articles in relation to horizontal analysis [ 8 ]. …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%