1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.13.2692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Van der Waals dipole-dipole and dipole-quadrupole energies in alkali halides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P, ec a (a) Hajj and Mayer [35, 361, (b) Jain et al [32], (c) Shanker and Rajoria [18]. 7;r Table 6 Calculated values of mode Gruneisen parameter (4) …”
Section: The Values Of Ionic Radii ( I + ) and ( R -) Have Been Takenmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…P, ec a (a) Hajj and Mayer [35, 361, (b) Jain et al [32], (c) Shanker and Rajoria [18]. 7;r Table 6 Calculated values of mode Gruneisen parameter (4) …”
Section: The Values Of Ionic Radii ( I + ) and ( R -) Have Been Takenmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each of the nine ions (five alkalis and four halogens) is described by five parameters, its polarizability, its shell charge, and three parameters which relate to ion size. The van der Waals coefficients are evaluated consistently from the ion polarizabilities [52]. The model system which has 47 free parameters, reproduces the lattice constants, high-and low-frequency dielectric constants 1531, and transverse optical mode frequencies for all the alkali halides to a high accuracy.…”
Section: Sangster-atwood Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set is now known [31] both to contain severe inconsistencies and to predict values that cannot stand comparison with modern ab initio computations [32][33][34][35]. Furthermore the potentials [28,29] contain semi-empirically determined dispersion coefficients [36] similar to those [37,38] now known [35] to be too large by factors of around three. These potentials do not, therefore, provide an attractive basis for investigating the structures of the encapsulated iodide nanocrystals.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that, at the time of these earlier works, reliable values were not known for either the vast majority of ionic polarizabilities or interionic dispersion coefficients. Consequently some credence was given to a set [36] of such coefficients most of whose members are now known from accurate ab initio computations [35] to be in error by factors of three or four. The successful reproduction [29,63] of a wide range of experimental data, although constituting very strong evidence that the total potentials are trustworthy for the bulk crystals, does not provide any evidence for the reliability of the individual shortrange and dispersive contributions.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%