2018
DOI: 10.3390/ma11040509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of UV Curing Properties of Mixture Systems with Differently Sized Monomers

Abstract: Ultraviolet (UV) curing is a photopolymerization technique resulting in a three-dimensional polymer network from monomers and oligomers after exposure to UV light, which is often used for fusion industry. However, shrinkage is an issue that needs to be resolved. Studies of single substances have been extensively conducted, but studies of mixture systems have not sufficiently been undertaken. In this study, we evaluate the shrinkage phenomenon by studying a monomer/monomer binary system and monomer/macromer com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Directly comparing the feature sizes of the pillars in Table 1 supports this conclusion. Although there were differences between the wing and the secondary mold structure diameters (ME ± 4%, AY ± 25%, TO ± 9%, BTR ± 9%, YTR ± 13%) and also with wing structure heights compared to molded (ME ± 10%, TO ± 9%, BTR ± 1%, YTR ± 13%), the small amount of shrinkage which can happen with UV-curable materials in combination with the natural variation of the wing leads us to believe these are insignificant [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. The molding method also enabled replica molding of the larger, micron-scale features on the wings, as seen in Supplementary Materials Figure S8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly comparing the feature sizes of the pillars in Table 1 supports this conclusion. Although there were differences between the wing and the secondary mold structure diameters (ME ± 4%, AY ± 25%, TO ± 9%, BTR ± 9%, YTR ± 13%) and also with wing structure heights compared to molded (ME ± 10%, TO ± 9%, BTR ± 1%, YTR ± 13%), the small amount of shrinkage which can happen with UV-curable materials in combination with the natural variation of the wing leads us to believe these are insignificant [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. The molding method also enabled replica molding of the larger, micron-scale features on the wings, as seen in Supplementary Materials Figure S8 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After curing, the particle volume V 2 represented 80%, 75%, 70%, and 68% of the initial droplet volume V 1 for the dispersed phase with 10 wt%, 20 wt%, 30 wt%, and 40 wt% water, respectively, as compared to 97-99% for the dispersed phase without any water. Shrinkage is inversely proportional to the molecular weight of the monomer units [53], which was not changed here, but it is also inversely proportional to the number of crosslinkable groups per unit volume, which is smaller at a higher water content in the dispersed phase. Therefore, in more dilute solutions, the average distance between prepolymer molecules is greater, and higher-volume contraction occurs during curing.…”
Section: Impact Of Water Content In the Dispersed Phase On Shrinkage/...mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…20,23 The basics for photopolymerization reactions is widely discussed in the literature. 17,20,23−25 Photopolymerization made good progress during the last two decades owing to its compatibility with smart and nanomaterials technologies 26 like 3D printing of polymers, novel chemistries, dynamic covalent cross-linking systems, 27 curing of thick parts 28 and composites, 19,29 of photocuring over conventional thermal curing methods are being an ambient room temperature process with very short cycle times (few seconds), high spatiotemporal control of energy input, high solvent resistance of cured films, low volatile organic emissions, low capital investments, low energy intensity, and reduced environmental impact. 30,31 The main drawbacks include limited light penetration depth, nonreversibility and nonrecyclability character of common photopolymers, and toxicity of some material precursors (e.g., photoinitiators fragments) which limit the applications of these materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%