2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08463-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of urban comprehensive carrying capacity: case study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entropy method determines the weight according to the degree of change in the original index data. As an objective weighting method, it avoids the shortcomings of the index weight tending to the subjective consciousness of the evaluators from weighting methods such as the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Delphi method (Zhao et al 2020a;Yang et al 2020). The TOPSIS method was first proposed by Hwang and Yoon (1981).…”
Section: Topsis Model Based On Entropy Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entropy method determines the weight according to the degree of change in the original index data. As an objective weighting method, it avoids the shortcomings of the index weight tending to the subjective consciousness of the evaluators from weighting methods such as the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Delphi method (Zhao et al 2020a;Yang et al 2020). The TOPSIS method was first proposed by Hwang and Yoon (1981).…”
Section: Topsis Model Based On Entropy Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the scholars have continuously enriched the definition of RECC, they have begun to study methods and models. At present, the evaluation methods of RECC mainly include entropy method and analytic hierarchy process (Zhao et al 2020, Jayanthi et al 2020, Diao et al 2019, strategic environmental assessment, and environmental impact assessment (Martinez-Grana et al 2014), ecological footprint method (Volodya et al 2018), fuzzy evaluation method (Yin et al 2020) (Cui et al 2019), logistic growth model (Streimikiene and Girdzijauskas 2008), artificial neural network model (Wu et al 2019, state-space model (Tang et al 2016), dynamic modeling (Lane et al 2014) and other models are used to evaluate the status quo and predict the future of RECC. The entropy-weight-based TOPSIS method has high credibility and accuracy and avoids the subjectivity of weight determination (Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Interactive Framework Of Reccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the main evaluation methods for resource and environmental sustainability are environmental impact assessment [ 30 ], ecological footprint method [ 31 ], emergy analysis [ 32 , 33 ], and cluster analysis [ 34 , 35 ]. The main methods for determining the weight of the RECC index system are entropy method and analytic hierarchy process [ 36 38 ]. The entropy-weight-based TOPSIS method has high credibility and accuracy, and avoids the subjectivity of weight determination [ 39 ].…”
Section: Interactive Framework Of Reccmentioning
confidence: 99%