2014
DOI: 10.3141/2433-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Unknown Foundations of Bridges Subjected to Scour

Abstract: Missing substructure information has impeded the safety assessment of bridges with unknown foundations, especially for scour-prone bridges. An approach based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) was developed to identify the inherent patterns in the substructure design of bridges with commonly available evidence (e.g., geometric characteristics of superstructures, loading conditions, soil properties, year built, and location) and then to generalize them further to bridges with unknown foundations. The proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new probabilistic methodology was developed in this study, incorporating estimates of bearing capacity predicted by ANN ensemble models and Bayesian inference framework for a full probabilistic characterization of unknown bridge foundations. Unlike the deterministic solution proposed by the authors (Yousefpour et al 2014), the probabilistic solution here aims at providing a transparent and systematic assessment of uncertainty of model parameters and predictions for unknown foundations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A new probabilistic methodology was developed in this study, incorporating estimates of bearing capacity predicted by ANN ensemble models and Bayesian inference framework for a full probabilistic characterization of unknown bridge foundations. Unlike the deterministic solution proposed by the authors (Yousefpour et al 2014), the probabilistic solution here aims at providing a transparent and systematic assessment of uncertainty of model parameters and predictions for unknown foundations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deterministic evidence-based approach using ANNs has been already introduced by the authors to predict the type and the embedment depth of unknown foundations (Yousefpour et al 2014). The proposed method predicts foundation characteristics based on available evidence of a bridge, including superstructure characteristics, loading, year built, and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this method over the first method is that, unlike LSTMs that are bridge-specific, the models can be trained by data from various bridges and subsequently can make predictions for any bridge at any location. Multilayer Perceptron networks (MLPs) are feed-forward neural networks proven successful for prediction and approximation in high-dimensional problems [25][26][27]. Three-layer MLP networks were developed to predict the maximum scour depth based on selected physical and engineering features (input parameters) governing the scour process.…”
Section: Methods 2: Maximum Scour Prediction Using Physically Driven Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilayer perceptron networks (MLPs) are feed-forward neural networks proven successful for prediction and approximation in high-dimensional problems ( 26 – 28 ). Three-layer MLP networks were developed to predict the maximum scour depth based on selected physical and engineering features (input parameters) governing the scour process.…”
Section: Methodology and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs have been widely used in various geotechnical applications [21], such as in prediction of pile capacity [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], constitutive modeling of soil [31][32][33][34][35][36][37], site characterization [38,39], earth-retaining structures [40], settlement of foundations [41,42], prediction of unknown foundations [43], slope stability [44,45], design of tunnels and underground openings [46,47], liquefaction [48][49][50][51][52], soil permeability and hydraulic conductivity [53], soil compaction [54,55], and soil classification [56,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%