1988
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90143-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of univariate ranges with a multivariate standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a single value needs to be set to monitor the complete acid-base status. The abnormality index takes into account the dependencies between the variables and is therefore to be preferred over setting limits for the variables separately [1]. Therapeutic actions after an alarm can then still be based on the original values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only a single value needs to be set to monitor the complete acid-base status. The abnormality index takes into account the dependencies between the variables and is therefore to be preferred over setting limits for the variables separately [1]. Therapeutic actions after an alarm can then still be based on the original values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, monitoring involves setting lower and upper limits for the variable in question. When monitoring the acid-base status with arterial pH, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) and actual arterial bicarbonate-ion concentration (a[HCO~]), however, the simultaneous use of lower and upper limits assumes the variables to be independent of each other, which may lead to false positive and false negative observations [1]. Moreover, the linear relationship between the variables makes separate monitoring of all three variables illogical [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%