The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icif.2007.4408049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of uncertainty visualization techniques for information fusion

Abstract: This paper highlights the importance of uncertainty visualization in information fusion, reviews general methods of representing uncertainty and presents perceptual and cognitive principles from Tufte, Chambers and Bertin as well as users experiments documented in the literature. Examples of uncertainty representations in information fusion are analyzed using these general theories. These principles can be used in future theoretical evaluations of existing or newly developed uncertainty visualization technique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that do not appear in our list include, e.g. conceptual evaluations that use heuristics derived from general guidelines and rules for data visualisation coined by Bertin, Tufte, Ware and Chambers (Riveiro, 2007a;Riveiro, 2007b;Wittenbrink et al, 1996;Zuk and Carpendale, 2006). Such studies, while not our focus here, do provide basic statements on the usability of different methods and therefore can help to choose suitable visualisation techniques.…”
Section: N Coincident/adjacentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that do not appear in our list include, e.g. conceptual evaluations that use heuristics derived from general guidelines and rules for data visualisation coined by Bertin, Tufte, Ware and Chambers (Riveiro, 2007a;Riveiro, 2007b;Wittenbrink et al, 1996;Zuk and Carpendale, 2006). Such studies, while not our focus here, do provide basic statements on the usability of different methods and therefore can help to choose suitable visualisation techniques.…”
Section: N Coincident/adjacentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, blurring or degradation of the data has an intuitive relation with uncertainty: the harder it is to see or recognize something, the more uncertain it appears [5]. However, blurring or degradation could inadvertently be interpreted as poor visualization quality [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The JDL/DFIG model 8 defines a six level approach for this purpose consisting of source preprocessing and subject assessment; object, situation, impact assessment; process refinement; and user (cognitive) refinement. The last level is necessary to overcome the HCI bottleneck in the information process fusion [51]. The important aspects are Cognitive aids that provide functions to aid and assist human understanding and exploitation of data Negative reasoning enhancement that helps to overcome the human tendency to seek for information which supports their hypothesis and ignore negative information…”
Section: General Vandv Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty representation methods that are necessary to improve quantification, visualization and, with that, the understanding of uncertainty Time compression/expansion replay techniques that can assist in understanding of evolving tactical situations, on account of human capabilities to detect changes Focus/defocus of attention techniques that can assist in directing the attention of an analyst to different aspects of data Pattern morphing methods that can translate patterns of data into forms that are easier to interpret for a human Information fusion strategies mentioned above need to be supplemented by evaluation of uncertainty visualization techniques for them. This is due to the fact that "huge quantities of (higher dimensional) data from several sources carrying various forms of uncertainty" need to be represented "on a two or three dimensional device" [51], which can only be done in a reliable way if this uncertainty is properly translated using generally accepted perceptual and cognitive principles. Automated recommender platforms support users in selecting appropriate software frameworks, interfaces, and interaction styles.…”
Section: General Vandv Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%