2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of umbilical cord entanglement as a predictive factor of adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Pergialiotis and colleagues also found that the cord entanglement is associated with the poor neonatal perinatal outcome. 21 It was observed in the current study that the fetuses who have more than two loops of cord there is significant increase in rate of Caesarean section and fetal distress manifested by the CTG abnormalities which is supported by the results of Schreiber and colleagues, 22 Sepulveda W 23 and Weiner and colleagues. 24 We found significantly increased risk of CTG abnormalities if the cord is tight and the tight loops are also found to be associated with the significant increase in rate of Caesarean section without decrease in apgar score and the increase in the NICU admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…20 Pergialiotis and colleagues also found that the cord entanglement is associated with the poor neonatal perinatal outcome. 21 It was observed in the current study that the fetuses who have more than two loops of cord there is significant increase in rate of Caesarean section and fetal distress manifested by the CTG abnormalities which is supported by the results of Schreiber and colleagues, 22 Sepulveda W 23 and Weiner and colleagues. 24 We found significantly increased risk of CTG abnormalities if the cord is tight and the tight loops are also found to be associated with the significant increase in rate of Caesarean section without decrease in apgar score and the increase in the NICU admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to some studies, the risk of Cesarean section (CS) is lower among women whose labour was induced than among those expectantly managed in term and post-term pregnancies with the benefits to the fetus and no increased risk of maternal death [5]. Induction of labour, regardless of the method used, is associated with a higher risk of postpartum haemorrhage [6], failed induction of labour [7], increased risk of CS [8], uterine hyperstimulation [9], increased risk of cord prolapse [10] and increased risk of uterine rupture [11].Labour induction is the most common interventional procedure in obstetrics. It is applied in 20% to 25% of all pregnancies [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SC improves uterine blood supply through vasodilatation and potentially could improve placental perfusion and hence reduce the risk of intrapartum fetal hypoxia (Dunn, Flenady and Kumar, 2016). Study of Pergialiotis, et al showed that there was involvement of cord entanglement to adverse neonatal perinatal outcomes.Fetal distress was significantly higher in the entanglement group (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.33, 1.69) (Pergialiotis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Risk Factorsforfetal Distress During Intrauterineinclude (1) Umbilical Cord Wrappingmentioning
confidence: 94%