2015
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of U.S. Poison Center Data for Surveillance of Foodborne Disease

Abstract: Based on this analysis, there are significant limitations to using self-reported FBD exposures to NPDS as a source of information for FBD surveillance of large national outbreaks and recalls; however, a syndromic approach may yield different results and should be explored. Improved data collection and coordination with public health agencies may improve the ability to use NPDS data to monitor FBD in near real-time, identify potential outbreaks, and improve situational awareness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every year, an estimated 600 million people, or about one in every ten people in the world, become ill as a result of ingesting contaminated food, with diarrheal diseases being the most frequent kind of illness [2]. They represent a great financial burden on society and represent a public health risk, resulting in acute morbidity and chronic consequences ( [3,4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every year, an estimated 600 million people, or about one in every ten people in the world, become ill as a result of ingesting contaminated food, with diarrheal diseases being the most frequent kind of illness [2]. They represent a great financial burden on society and represent a public health risk, resulting in acute morbidity and chronic consequences ( [3,4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the most obvious foodborne outbreaks usually are not adequately investigated, not reported or go undetected [ 2 ]. Enhancing FBD surveillance and improving the timeliness of outbreak detection have been identified as public health priorities [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derby et al 11 in 2005 found that data collected by 2 poison centers in Arizona differed from data collected by a county public health department and concluded that poison control data may be a useful addition to surveillance data reported to state public health agencies for the early detection of infectious FBDOs. Gruber et al 12 in 2015 found that unusual changes in the number of FBDO-related telephone calls to poison centers occurred after announcements of national outbreaks and recalls, citing limitations in using poison center data for foodborne disease surveillance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%