2018
DOI: 10.1002/em.22250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of U. S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) mouse lymphoma assay data using International Workshop on Genotoxicity Tests (IWGT) and the Organization for Economic Co‐Operation and Development (OECD) criteria

Abstract: The forward gene mutation mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) is widely used, as part of a regulatory test battery, to identify the genotoxic potential of chemicals. It identifies mutagens capable of inducing a variety of genetic events. During the 1980s and early 1990s, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) developed a publicly available database (https://tools.niehs.nih.gov/cebs3/ui/) of MLA results. This database is used to define the mutagenic potential of chemicals, to develop structure–activity relationships… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall positive findings in the MLA and overall negative Hprt data support a predominantly clastogenic effect of benzene, as the induction of small colonies due to slow growing mutants in the MLA is considered indicative of clastogenicity rather than a point mutation (OECD 2015). On the other hand, other experts considered the results for benzene uninterpretable upon review (Kirkland et al 2011;Schisler et al 2018).…”
Section: Invitro Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall positive findings in the MLA and overall negative Hprt data support a predominantly clastogenic effect of benzene, as the induction of small colonies due to slow growing mutants in the MLA is considered indicative of clastogenicity rather than a point mutation (OECD 2015). On the other hand, other experts considered the results for benzene uninterpretable upon review (Kirkland et al 2011;Schisler et al 2018).…”
Section: Invitro Datamentioning
confidence: 99%