1995
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3365-3367.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two rapid antigen assays, BioStar Strep A OIA and Pacific Biotech CARDS O.S., and culture for detection of group A streptococci in throat swabs

Abstract: REFERENCES 1. Dale, J. C., E. A. Vetter, J. M. Contezac, L. D. Iverson, P. C. Wollan, and F. R. Cockerill III. 1994. Evaluation of two rapid antigen assays, BioStar Strep A OIA and Pacific Biotech CARDS O.S., and culture for detection of group A streptococci in throat swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2698-2701. 2. Daly, J. A., E. K. Korgenski, A. C. Munson, and E. Llausas-Magana. 1994. Optical immunoassay for streptococcal pharyngitis: evaluation of accuracy with routine and mucoid strains associated with acute r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RADTs may provide significant cost-benefit advantages if the test sensitivity is adequately high. [36][37][38] In the USA, as at our participating sites, the cost of a RADT (US$5-10) is somewhat lower than the cost of a throat culture (US$ [15][16][17][18][19][20]. 39 There were several limitations to our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RADTs may provide significant cost-benefit advantages if the test sensitivity is adequately high. [36][37][38] In the USA, as at our participating sites, the cost of a RADT (US$5-10) is somewhat lower than the cost of a throat culture (US$ [15][16][17][18][19][20]. 39 There were several limitations to our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RADT has internal positive and negative controls and has a reported sensitivity range of 79.5-98.1% and specificity of 96.9-99.0%, compared to throat culture. [15][16][17]20,21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rapid test had internal positive and negative controls and has a reported sensitivity range of 79.5% to 98.1% and specificity of 96.9% to 99.0%, compared with throat culture. [29][30][31][32][33] Both sites independently were provided with uniform training and regular site visits to ensure uniform laboratory procedures for both throat culture and rapid tests.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%