2014
DOI: 10.1590/1677-3225v13n3a01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two methods for mixed dentition analysis using the method error

Abstract: The most commonly used tests to assess the mesiodistal width of the unerupted permanent canines and premolars are divided in two groups: those performed directly on plaster models, using mathematical equations that can generate tables, and those using radiographs. Aim: In order to determine the reliability between two of these methodologically different method, this study evaluated the systematic and random errors of the method proposed by Tanaka and Johnston, which is based on the sum of mandibular permanent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every dental arch form is unique, including size and shape depending on the race. Therefore, it may have considerable implications in the patient's diagnostic and treatment planning and may affect the esthetics space available, and ultimately the arch forms future stability [2]. No two individuals exhibit the same arch form and people of similar ethnicities [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every dental arch form is unique, including size and shape depending on the race. Therefore, it may have considerable implications in the patient's diagnostic and treatment planning and may affect the esthetics space available, and ultimately the arch forms future stability [2]. No two individuals exhibit the same arch form and people of similar ethnicities [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%