2015
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Two Lyophilized Molecular Assays to Rapidly Detect Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Directly from Clinical Samples in Field Settings

Abstract: SummaryAccurate, timely diagnosis is essential for the control, monitoring and eradication of foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD). Clinical samples from suspect cases are normally tested at reference laboratories. However, transport of samples to these centralized facilities can be a lengthy process that can impose delays on critical decision making. These concerns have motivated work to evaluate simple‐to‐use technologies, including molecular‐based diagnostic platforms, that can be deployed closer to suspect cases o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Ag‐LFDs have only been validated for use with epithelial suspension and vesicular fluid, and limited analytical sensitivity restricts their usefulness to the acute stage of infection (Ferris et al., , ). As a consequence, attempts to transfer highly sensitive rRT‐PCR assays onto portable detection platforms have been investigated (Hearps et al., ; Howson et al., ; Madi et al., ; Monwina et al., ; Paixão et al., ), but are either not commercially available or are only suitable for research purposes (i.e., not diagnostic use). This study evaluates the performance of a commercially available, lyophilized FMDV pan‐serotype‐specific assay, in combination with a commercially available portable thermocycler, in laboratory and East African field settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ag‐LFDs have only been validated for use with epithelial suspension and vesicular fluid, and limited analytical sensitivity restricts their usefulness to the acute stage of infection (Ferris et al., , ). As a consequence, attempts to transfer highly sensitive rRT‐PCR assays onto portable detection platforms have been investigated (Hearps et al., ; Howson et al., ; Madi et al., ; Monwina et al., ; Paixão et al., ), but are either not commercially available or are only suitable for research purposes (i.e., not diagnostic use). This study evaluates the performance of a commercially available, lyophilized FMDV pan‐serotype‐specific assay, in combination with a commercially available portable thermocycler, in laboratory and East African field settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, PCR‐based assays such as RRT‐PCR assays are highly sensitive (>95%) and specific and therefore widely used for routine laboratory‐based detection of FMDV. Over the last decade, a number of attempts were made to transfer the laboratory‐based RRT‐PCR assays to portable PCR equipment that can be operated in the field (Callahan et al., ; Hearps et al., ; Risatti et al., ; Tomlinson et al., ; Rasmussen et al., ; Takekawa et al., ; Madi et al., ; Molsa et al., , ; Liu et al., ; Howson et al., ). These portable PCR instruments, however, depend on precision thermocycling, are highly sophisticated and therefore expensive and delicate for field use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMD outbreaks have to be quickly detected and contained, and therefore, onsite detection tools are highly desirable. To date, a number of field‐deployable molecular assays have been developed and evaluated for their potential to use in the field to support local decision‐making (Dukes et al., ; Chen et al., ,b; Madi et al., ; Abd El Wahed et al., ; Yamazaki et al., ; Kasanga et al., ; Ranjan et al., ; Waters et al., ; Howson et al., ), and some of them have been successfully tested in the field (Madi et al., ; Abd El Wahed et al., ; Howson et al., ). To our knowledge, none of those assays are commercially available yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Howson et al. (); the lyophilization of the assay reagents, as shown by Howson et al. (); and the development of an alternative visualization strategy as described by Waters et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%