2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of treatment modalities and prognostic factors in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
37
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Nasolacrimal duct silicone intubation is generally reserved for patients with persistent obstruction after failed probing or as a primary method in older children. 6 The procedure has been used to reduce the need for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). It has been displayed that nasolacrimal duct intubation is a successful procedure in children aged up to 7 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Nasolacrimal duct silicone intubation is generally reserved for patients with persistent obstruction after failed probing or as a primary method in older children. 6 The procedure has been used to reduce the need for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). It has been displayed that nasolacrimal duct intubation is a successful procedure in children aged up to 7 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age is considered a risk factor by many authors as the success rate declines after 2 years of age 2 8 9 12 20. However, other studies,1 3 10 including ours, did not consider age as a risk factor for probing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have encouraged silastic intubation as a primary procedure despite the fact that probing has lower complications and is relatively easy to perform 2 8–14. Reasons for encouraging silastic intubation include declining success rates of probing with age and successful silastic intubation after a failed probing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Im Falle eines konservativen Therapieversagens gilt die TWS mit S als Therapie der Wahl [3,12]. Neuere Untersuchungen zeigen ihre Überlegenheit gegenüber der einfachen Tränenwegsspülung ohne anschließende Schlauchintubation [18,19]. Aufgrund der bei Kindern sehr engen Verhältnisse unter der unteren Nasenmuschel kann es im weiteren Verlauf nach Spülung ohne anschließende Intubation zu einer Re-Stenosierung durch narbigen Wiederverschluss der Hasner-Membran kommen.…”
unclassified