2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Spectra of Peptides by Random Forest with Amino Acid Labels: Results from a Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards Interlaboratory Study

Abstract: We report the results of a VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) interlaboratory study on the identification of peptide sample TOF-SIMS spectra by machine learning. More than 1000 time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) spectra of six peptide model samples (one of them was a test sample) were collected using 27 TOF-SIMS instruments from 25 institutes of six countries, the U. S., the U. K., Germany, China, South Korea, and Japan. Because peptides have systematic and si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Machine and deep learning methods have been employed for interpreting complex mass spectral and imaging data. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] For example, an autoencoder is an ANN-based unsupervised method. It has been applied to interpret complex ToF-SIMS data 20,21,24 and to extract important sample features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Machine and deep learning methods have been employed for interpreting complex mass spectral and imaging data. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] For example, an autoencoder is an ANN-based unsupervised method. It has been applied to interpret complex ToF-SIMS data 20,21,24 and to extract important sample features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural network (ANN)‐based flexible methods allow the interpretation of complex ToF‐SIMS data despite the matrix effects 14 . Machine and deep learning methods have been employed for interpreting complex mass spectral and imaging data 15–25 . For example, an autoencoder is an ANN‐based unsupervised method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of the abovementioned systems, the classical mass-interpretation methods were replaced with advanced data analysis techniques. For instance, Aoyagi et al [47] conducted an interlaboratory study on the identification of the peptide sample ToF-SIMS data by machine learning where the spectra of the test peptide sample were predicted by random forest. Also, in medical studies, Zhang et al [48] used machine learning algorithms on serum blueprints extracted from LDI-MS for the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low surface amounts (submonolayer coverage) of single amino acids (e.g., Phe, Gly and Leu 22 ) and peptides such as RGD, 23,24 RGDS 25 and phosphorylated RGDS 25 were detectable by ToF‐SIMS and with the recent development of MS–MS capabilities for SIMS, proteins can also be identified 26 . Increasingly sophisticated tools such as machine learning algorithms 27 emerge to aid qualitative SIMS data interpretation and identification of amino acids and peptides. Due to the matrix effect, that is, the dependence of secondary ion intensities on the presence of other materials in the sample ion intensities derived from ToF‐SIMS are generally not considered quantitative 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%