2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments

Abstract: IMPORTANCEFor critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses and poor prognoses, overuse of invasive intensive care unit (ICU) treatments may prolong suffering without benefit.OBJECTIVE To examine whether use of time-limited trials (TLTs) as the default care-planning approach for critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses was associated with decreased duration and intensity of nonbeneficial ICU care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis prospective quality improvement study was conducted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
41
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One in four patients in our study may have been receiving unwanted aggressive care in the acute setting. It is possible that LST was provided with the mutual understanding of a timelimited trial, whereby family and clinicians have agreed on a period of aggressive interventions to see if the patient improves according to outcomes consistent with the patient's presumed goals-of-care (10,20). In that case, this relatively high prevalence of aggressive care may be ethically justified as long as the prognostic uncertainty persists and as long as the time-limited trial is brought to a conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One in four patients in our study may have been receiving unwanted aggressive care in the acute setting. It is possible that LST was provided with the mutual understanding of a timelimited trial, whereby family and clinicians have agreed on a period of aggressive interventions to see if the patient improves according to outcomes consistent with the patient's presumed goals-of-care (10,20). In that case, this relatively high prevalence of aggressive care may be ethically justified as long as the prognostic uncertainty persists and as long as the time-limited trial is brought to a conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physician should then schedule a date to discuss progress, or lack of improvement, and further options with the patient or surrogate, unless new findings or changes require significant discussions sooner. This constitutes a time-limited trial, which is a useful framework for acknowledging the uncertainty of outcomes of critical illness [2].…”
Section: When To Discuss Withdrawal Of Life Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chances that antibiotic therapy and mechanical ventilation will be successful are small but an ICU test will give the patient and their family the reassurance that everything possible has been done. In a multicentre, quality improvement study in critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses who were at risk of receiving non‐beneficial ICU treatments, introduction of time‐limited trials as the default approach to such patients was associated with improved communication with relatives and reduced intensity and duration of ICU treatments [33]. Importantly, the patient (where possible) and the family must be fully aware and agreed that this is just a trial for a limited period of time and that if no benefit is seen within the specified timeframe, the treatment will be withdrawn [31].…”
Section: End‐of‐life Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%