2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70851-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of tibial rotational axis in total knee arthroplasty using magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment of the tibial component are thought to play a significant role in the outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In addition, tibial component malrotation is associated with pain, stiffness, and altered patellofemoral kinematics in TKA. However, measuring tibial component rotation after TKA is difficult. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in TKA. To investigate the morp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 17 The PCA is often used in other orthopaedic subspecialties (eg, to assess rotation in patients with tibial torsion or to assess the component position for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty). 28 , 34 Utilizing the PCA as a reference, we calculated an angle (mean, 102.6° ± 8.3°) to define the hinge axis position as a reproducible reference point for the ideal hinge axis position in MOWHTO when no PTS correction is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 The PCA is often used in other orthopaedic subspecialties (eg, to assess rotation in patients with tibial torsion or to assess the component position for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty). 28 , 34 Utilizing the PCA as a reference, we calculated an angle (mean, 102.6° ± 8.3°) to define the hinge axis position as a reproducible reference point for the ideal hinge axis position in MOWHTO when no PTS correction is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of tibial component internal rotation have been debated and discussed in other papers (Liu et al, 2020;Nam et al, 2020;Planckaert et al, 2018), and even though the literature data imply different resection angles that determine internal rotation of the tibial component, the particularity of our study lies in the fact that our analysis used the finite element method, which allowed us to determine the minimum value threshold that determines micro changes of the tibia, cement and polyethylene without causing symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lu [ 19 ] found the mismatch angles between the Akagi line and the SEA were 0.8° ± 5.0° and 3.0° ± 4.5° in the non-osteoarthritis knees of the male and female, respectively. The angular differences between the male and female have also been shown to exist in the varus knees [ 23 ]. However, the influence of gender differences on the locations of the patellar tendon attachment site as the anatomical landmark has not been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Installing femoral and tibial component in accordance with SEA is consistent with biomechanical characteristics [ 12 , 22 ]. On the tibial side, due to the inability of the surgeons to locate the SEA directly on the proximal tibial osteotomy surface, the researchers have attempted to establish optimal tibial rotational axes using appropriate intra- or extra-articular anatomical landmarks, such as the medial boundary of the tibial tuberosity [ 16 , 20 ], the medial third boundary of the tibial tuberosity [ 20 , 23 ], the anterior cortex of the tibia [ 16 ], the anterior tibial crest [ 19 , 21 ] and the tibial posterior condylar [ 23 , 25 , 26 ]. However, there is still a lack of consensus on tibial rotational alignment due to the low confidence and high individual variability of reference axes [ 13 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation