1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1996.tb01799.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of three pesticide leaching models with experimental data for alachlor, atrazine and metribuzin

Abstract: Summary The persistence and movement of residues of alachlor, alrazine and metribuzin were measured in a mini‐lysimeter system in the field. This comprised a number of soil columns (11 cm diametert; 30 cm long), and permitted the vertical distribution of residues to be determined at. intervals alter application and the collection and analysis of leaehale water. Laboratory experiments were also performed to determine the degradation rates of the three herbicides and their strengths of adsorption by the test soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
5
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The values were very close; however the predicted values were higher than the observed value for chlorpyrifos. This observation was similar to that reported by Walker (1996Walker ( , 1987, whereby the predicted values were overestimated. The degree of agreement between the predicted and the observed values was evaluated using the coefficient of residual mass (Halimah et al 2016b;Ismail et al 2015a;Maznah et al 2015).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Standard Calibration Curve And Recovesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values were very close; however the predicted values were higher than the observed value for chlorpyrifos. This observation was similar to that reported by Walker (1996Walker ( , 1987, whereby the predicted values were overestimated. The degree of agreement between the predicted and the observed values was evaluated using the coefficient of residual mass (Halimah et al 2016b;Ismail et al 2015a;Maznah et al 2015).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Standard Calibration Curve And Recovesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The CRM value for PERSIST on the day of spray (Day 0) was 1, indicating that there is perfect agreement between the predicted and observed value Walker et al 1996). On the first, third and fifth day after treatment, the CRM value predicted by PERSIST was slightly higher compared to the observed values.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Standard Calibration Curve And Recovementioning
confidence: 71%
“…1) that contained 0.9% organic carbon, 67.1% (vol/vol) sand, 16.6% (vol/vol) silt, and 16.3% (vol/vol) clay and had a pH of 6.8 (27). The second soil (Hunts Mill field) contained 1.91% organic matter, 75% (vol/vol) sand, 10% (vol/vol) silt, and 15% (vol/vol) clay and had a pH of 5.97 (26). The soil samples were sieved (mesh size, 2 mm), air dried at room temperature to a water content of 4% (wt/vol), and stored at 10°C until they were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K oc (mL g À1 ) t 1/2 (days) References Barriuso et al (1997); Baskaran et al (1996);Ismail and Tet-Vun (2003); James et al (1995) Alachlor 57e457 e 21 8e200 e 13 Patakioutas and Albanis (2002); Sakaliene et al (2007); Sonon and Schwab (1995); Stolpe and Shea (1995); Walker et al (1996); Weed et al (1995); Yen et al (1994) Fig . 1.…”
Section: Herbicidesmentioning
confidence: 99%