2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of three methods for estimating the weathering rates of base cations in forested catchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimates of BC WR simulated with the PROFILE model for the reference period are within the range reported for southern Quebec or similar soil types using other methods (Courchesne et al, 2002;Schaller et al, 2009;Augustin et al, 2016Augustin et al, , 2018. The data show substantial BC WR increases (+ 11-25%) for the two future periods relative to the reference period.…”
Section: Future Changes In Bc Weathering Ratessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The estimates of BC WR simulated with the PROFILE model for the reference period are within the range reported for southern Quebec or similar soil types using other methods (Courchesne et al, 2002;Schaller et al, 2009;Augustin et al, 2016Augustin et al, , 2018. The data show substantial BC WR increases (+ 11-25%) for the two future periods relative to the reference period.…”
Section: Future Changes In Bc Weathering Ratessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…described in previous studies (Houle et al, 2012b;Augustin et al, 2015aAugustin et al, , 2016. In this region, the Canadian Shield is composed of bedrocks formed during the Precambrian, which consists mainly of igneous (granite, syenite, anorthosite) and metamorphic (gneiss, granitic gneiss, paragneiss) rocks.…”
Section: Study Sites and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results have been found in other studies, as indicated by high modelled-to-historic weathering rate ratio (Wprofile/Wdepletion). At catchment scale, Augustin et al (2016) found that weathering estimated by PROFILE was on average 4-fold greater than weathering based on the depletion method. At the pedon scale, Stendahl et al (2013) found Wprofile/Wdepletion ratios of 2.3 and 2.2 for two sites near Flakaliden, Vindeln and Svartberget, which are similar values to that found for Flakaliden in our study (2.0).…”
Section: Depletion Methods Estimates Versus Profile Model Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 86%