2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp110374b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches for Describing the Interaction of Water with Linear Acenes

Abstract: The interaction of a water monomer with a series of linear acenes (benzene, anthracene, pentacene, heptacene, and nonacene) is investigated using a wide range of electronic structure methods, including several "dispersion"-corrected density functional theory (DFT) methods, several variants of the random phase approximation (RPA), DFT-based symmetry-adapted perturbation theory with density fitting (DF-DFT-SAPT), MP2, and coupled-cluster methods. The DF-DFT-SAPT calculations are used to monitor the evolution of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMBER binding energy between a water molecule and a (3, 3)SWCNT [similar to the (3, 3)SWCNT used for the AMBER validation described above] is between −4.6 to −5.0 kJ mol −1 . This is slightly less than previously reported interaction strengths of −6.8 to −14.0 kJ mol −1 between a water molecule and graphene‐like surfaces . Consequently, the calculated solubility coefficient of water might be slightly underestimated and the diffusion coefficient slightly overestimated for the systems containing graphene or a SWCNT; however, the obtained trends in solubility and diffusion coefficients of water with increasing temperatures are not expected to be affected.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AMBER binding energy between a water molecule and a (3, 3)SWCNT [similar to the (3, 3)SWCNT used for the AMBER validation described above] is between −4.6 to −5.0 kJ mol −1 . This is slightly less than previously reported interaction strengths of −6.8 to −14.0 kJ mol −1 between a water molecule and graphene‐like surfaces . Consequently, the calculated solubility coefficient of water might be slightly underestimated and the diffusion coefficient slightly overestimated for the systems containing graphene or a SWCNT; however, the obtained trends in solubility and diffusion coefficients of water with increasing temperatures are not expected to be affected.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This is slightly less than previously reported interaction strengths of 26.8 to 214.0 kJ mol 21 between a water molecule and graphene-like surfaces. 57,58 Consequently, the calculated solubility coefficient of water might be slightly underestimated and the diffusion coefficient slightly overestimated for the systems containing graphene or a SWCNT; however, the obtained trends in solubility and diffusion coefficients of water with increasing temperatures are not expected to be affected. In contrast, the intermolecular interaction between oxygen molecules is negligible in the gas phase (it behaves as an ideal gas), and the binding strength between the additive and the oxygen may therefore attract oxygen into the composite.…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the well-converged numbers reported in this work may serve as benchmarks for future studies. Beyond the specific examples given here, our RI framework as a whole has already proven to be stable and mature in a number of scientific applications [40,41,96,176,[206][207][208]. Based on the results above, NAOs emerge as a promising route towards more compact basis sets for correlated methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…129 In MP2C, the dispersion energy based on uncoupled HF of KS states is replaced with the dispersion components calculated in the corresponding coupled perturbation formalism, which has been shown to significantly improve interaction energies for dispersion bound systems. [130][131][132] Another successful application is the use of SAPT-derived potential energy surfaces (PESs), where the PES is calculated on a representative grid using SAPT(@DFT). This PES is then interpolated at runtime to perform, e.g., extended molecular dynamics simulations with quantumchemical accuracy nearly at the cost of molecular mechanics, which has been proven a viable tool for studying simple biomolecular assemblies, vdW complexes, crystal structures, or condensed phase systems, for instance.…”
Section: Perturbational Energy Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%