1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02668210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the wettability of liquid aluminum with ceramic particulates (SiC, TiC, AI2O3) by means of pressure infiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…do not wet ionocovalent ceramics such as alumina, silicon carbide or graphite and, for this reason, infiltration is achieved by applying a sufficiently high pressure P0 (Figure 13a) to overcome the capillary pressure P C = −(2σ LV /r eff ) cosθ (6) where reff is an effective pore radius characteristic of the preform and θ the contact angle on pore walls. In numerous studies published since the 1990s (see for instance [23,24]), it has been found that the infiltration distance h increases parabolically with both time t and excess pressure ∆P = P0 − PC. This agrees with the following equation established by Washburn [25] assuming that infiltration is limited by viscous friction:…”
Section: Wetting In Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…do not wet ionocovalent ceramics such as alumina, silicon carbide or graphite and, for this reason, infiltration is achieved by applying a sufficiently high pressure P0 (Figure 13a) to overcome the capillary pressure P C = −(2σ LV /r eff ) cosθ (6) where reff is an effective pore radius characteristic of the preform and θ the contact angle on pore walls. In numerous studies published since the 1990s (see for instance [23,24]), it has been found that the infiltration distance h increases parabolically with both time t and excess pressure ∆P = P0 − PC. This agrees with the following equation established by Washburn [25] assuming that infiltration is limited by viscous friction:…”
Section: Wetting In Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature data on the surface tension of pure Al are very scattered due to high sensitivity of Al to oxidation, and even for the temperatures close to melting point of Al, they are in the range of about 820-1100 mN/m (Ref [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Among alloying elements used in commercial Al alloys such additions as Li, Bi, Pb, Mg, Sb, Ca, Sn, and Sr are known to reduce the surface tension of Al, while Ge, Zn, Ag, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Cu increase the surface tension (Ref 22,23,(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among alloying elements used in commercial Al alloys such additions as Li, Bi, Pb, Mg, Sb, Ca, Sn, and Sr are known to reduce the surface tension of Al, while Ge, Zn, Ag, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Cu increase the surface tension (Ref 22,23,(27)(28)(29). Nevertheless, the effect of alloying elements on interaction in different Al/ceramic systems has been discussed in several publications [e.g., (Ref 18,19,(30)(31)(32)]. By applying the sessile drop (SD) method at 750°C, Candan (Ref 18) made the direct measurements of the contact angles (h) formed by different Al alloys on SiC substrates and found that the addition of 1.4 wt.% Pb to Al causes slight decrease of h (118°), compared to pure Al (123°); alloying Al with 3.4 wt.% Mg or 0.8 wt.% Ca contributes to better wettability improvement (113°and 105°, respectively) and only Al-8.6Mg and Al-13.9Mg alloys wet SiC (65°and 59°, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Ill], Jonas et al [112], Mortensen [33], and others [113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124] followed him with some modifications in their systems. In this method, generally the molten metal is stationary in a chamber under a controlled atmosphere at elevated temperature.…”
Section: Infiltration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%