2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the virucidal performance of domestic laundry procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of AOB on the hygiene effectiveness of machine laundering has also been demonstrated by Terpstra et al 2003;Lichtenberg et al 2006;Linke et al 2011;Bellante et al, 2011, Vossebein 2013and Lucassen et al 2013. The data of Heinzel et al 2010 suggest that laundering with AOB detergent can also enhance effectiveness against viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of AOB on the hygiene effectiveness of machine laundering has also been demonstrated by Terpstra et al 2003;Lichtenberg et al 2006;Linke et al 2011;Bellante et al, 2011, Vossebein 2013and Lucassen et al 2013. The data of Heinzel et al 2010 suggest that laundering with AOB detergent can also enhance effectiveness against viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The data of Heinzel et al . suggest that laundering with AOB detergent can also enhance effectiveness against viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, bleach (AOB or chlorine bleach) does considerably improve the antiviral efficacy during laundering, but only when temperatures of 60°C or higher are used, can the complete inactivation of nonenveloped viruses such as poliovirus or norovirus be assured (Heinzel et al . ; Lemm et al . ).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Laundering Against Different Groups Of Micro‐orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies suggest that laundering is more effective against enveloped viruses, most probably because the phospholipid envelope can be disrupted by the detergent (Sidwell and Dixon 1969;Gerba 2001;Gerba and Kennedy 2007;Gerhardts et al 2009;Heinzel et al 2010). Again, bleach (AOB or chlorine bleach) does considerably improve the antiviral efficacy during laundering, but only when temperatures of 60°C or higher are used, can the complete inactivation of nonenveloped viruses such as poliovirus or norovirus be assured (Heinzel et al 2010;Lemm et al 2014). Interestingly, although viral infections must be considered very relevant for laundry hygiene, efficacy testing mostly focuses on bacteria (Anon 2013).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Laundering Against Different Groups Of Micro-orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of low-temperature wash cycles has demonstrated effectiveness in either inactivation or removal of healthcare-associated pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, total coliforms, Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, poliovirus, adenovirus, and pollen allergens. 5,[21][22][23][24][25] Use of hot water provides a sanitizing effect capable of producing microbial reduction of at least 5 log 10 per square centimeter. 18 A temperature of at least 160°F (71°C) for a minimum of 25 minutes is recommended frequently for traditional hot-water washing.…”
Section: Microbial Reductions Associated With Washing and Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%