2010 Second International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine 2010
DOI: 10.1109/etelemed.2010.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Use of an Ask-the-Expert e-Consultation Service for Support on Health-Related Requests

Abstract: E-consultation in health care can be used to respond to an increasing demand for care by offering support on health-related requests. In this study we evaluated the use of an "ask-the-expert" e-consultation service in order to assess whether the service is efficient and useful. A content analysis of e-mail exchange between clients and online health professionals was performed to gain insight in the purposes of use of the service. Our findings show that the e-consultation service was used for health requests on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We synthesized 63 papers ( Figure 1 ), including 52 (83%) journal papers [ 53 ], 7 (11%) evaluation reports [ 85 ], 3 (5%) conference papers [ 12 ], and 1 (2%) master’s degree thesis [ 13 ]. The studies were quantitative (33/63, 52%), qualitative (12/63, 19%), and mixed methods (18/63, 29%) and analyzed data from patients (16/63, 25% qualitative studies and 18/63, 29% quantitative studies), staff (22/63, 35% qualitative studies and 9/63, 14% quantitative studies), and clinical systems (33/63, 52% quantitative studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We synthesized 63 papers ( Figure 1 ), including 52 (83%) journal papers [ 53 ], 7 (11%) evaluation reports [ 85 ], 3 (5%) conference papers [ 12 ], and 1 (2%) master’s degree thesis [ 13 ]. The studies were quantitative (33/63, 52%), qualitative (12/63, 19%), and mixed methods (18/63, 29%) and analyzed data from patients (16/63, 25% qualitative studies and 18/63, 29% quantitative studies), staff (22/63, 35% qualitative studies and 9/63, 14% quantitative studies), and clinical systems (33/63, 52% quantitative studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased equity (qualitative and quantitative) [ 7 , 8 , 12 - 27 , 52 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 63 , 64 , 70 - 73 , 85 , 87 - 92 , 94 , 95 , 97 , 98 , 100 , 101 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[63]), three conference papers (e.g. [64]), and one Master's degree thesis [65]. Studies were quantitative (n=32, 52%), qualitative (n=12, 19%), and mixed methods (n=18, 29%), and analysed data from patients (16 qualitative, 17 quantitative studies), staff (22 qualitative studies, 9 quantitative studies), and clinical systems (32 quantitative studies).…”
Section: Descriptive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%