2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14095309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Use of Sewage Sludge Biochar as a Soil Amendment—A Review

Abstract: In recent decades, minimization and recycling/reuse policies were introduced to reduce the quantities of generated waste and for alternative waste recovery. Organic wastes represent 46% of total global solid waste. Possible uses of organic wastes include using it as fertilizer and amendment for soil, for energy recovery and for the production of chemical substances. Sewage sludge disposal and reuse are identified as future problems concerning waste. The total amount of sludge generated in the entire world has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… We conducted further peak fitting and calculation of the Mo 3d fine spectrum of PMABC-200. The characteristic peaks at 232.7 and 235.7 eV corresponded to MoO 3 , whereas those at 231.9 and 234.8 eV corresponded to MoO 4 . As presented in Table S1, the content of oxygen-containing functional groups (such as C–OH, C–O–C, and CO) on the surface of PMABC-200 was higher than that of BC-200, with the exception of the O–CO group. The total content of the oxygen-containing groups on the surface of PMABC-200 (41.5%) was greater than that of BC-200 (39.4%), indicating that new oxygen-containing groups were generated on PMABC-200 through the modification with phosphomolybdic acid oxidation.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… We conducted further peak fitting and calculation of the Mo 3d fine spectrum of PMABC-200. The characteristic peaks at 232.7 and 235.7 eV corresponded to MoO 3 , whereas those at 231.9 and 234.8 eV corresponded to MoO 4 . As presented in Table S1, the content of oxygen-containing functional groups (such as C–OH, C–O–C, and CO) on the surface of PMABC-200 was higher than that of BC-200, with the exception of the O–CO group. The total content of the oxygen-containing groups on the surface of PMABC-200 (41.5%) was greater than that of BC-200 (39.4%), indicating that new oxygen-containing groups were generated on PMABC-200 through the modification with phosphomolybdic acid oxidation.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Compared with the current utilization method for sewage sludge, pyrolysis offers numerous advantages. Along with other benefits, pyrolysis reduces the volume of solid residue and effectively stabilizes heavy metals present in the sludge by subjecting it to an inert gas atmosphere . Sludge pyrolysis has recently garnered considerable research interest. , Sewage sludge is known to be a good feedstock material for pyrolysis as it is rich in organic matter and various types of waste biomass. , Biochar (BC) is the solid product of pyrolysis and is regarded as an efficient and inexpensive adsorbent owing to its simple and cheap preparation and good adsorbability .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have noted negative impacts on ryegrass, although the reason for the poor performance (the crop, feed material, or both) could not be determined (Jeffery et al, 2011). Variables impacting biosolid‐derived biochar impacts on crops can include pyrolysis feed material, pyrolysis temperature, soil characteristics, and land application rates, among other factors (Goldan et al, 2022; Jeffery et al, 2011). The widely differing results presented in the literature highlight the need for additional and long‐term studies to better understand the influence of the factors noted above on the performance of biosolid‐derived biochars for crop production and identify suitable outlets for these materials.…”
Section: What We Know About Biosolids Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sewage sludge pyrolysis is considered an acceptable method from economic and ecological perspectives for the beneficial reuse of sewage sludge. This method has many advantages such as reducing sludge volume by 80%, the removal of pathogenic agents and hazardous compounds from SS, metals being immobilized in a solid residue, thus reducing their leaching, and organic and inorganic fractions being immobilized in a stabilized form of pyrolytic residues (biochar) [ 10 ]. There are many benefits of biochar (BC) production: energy production, sustainable waste recycling, carbon sequestration, improvement in soil quality, plant development, and mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [ 6 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%