2011
DOI: 10.21153/jtlge2010vol1no1art548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the use of Assessment Centre methodology to enhance development planning, work placement outcomes and work readiness for postgraduate students - a pilot

Abstract: Acknowledgements:We wish to thank Nick Carter for the provision of his expertise and knowledge in the development of the centre, Cameron Czerczyk who worked on this project as part of a work placement and Saville and Holdsworth Limited (SHL) for generously donating the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) for use in the project. AbstractWork placements as a form of Work Integrated Learning (WIL) are widely recognised for the positive impact they have on improving the employability and work readiness of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of the AC included the provision of feedback on students' assessment and identification of their development needs. While participants found the AC exercises to be difficult, there was a consensus among participants that they assess relevant competencies and are useful for their development (Howard, 1997;Keele, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Assessment Center (Ac) Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of the AC included the provision of feedback on students' assessment and identification of their development needs. While participants found the AC exercises to be difficult, there was a consensus among participants that they assess relevant competencies and are useful for their development (Howard, 1997;Keele, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Assessment Center (Ac) Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each competency was assessed by two exercises yielding 14 competency component ratings (i.e., 7 * 2 = 14). The competencies had previously been identified as essential for successful transition into the workplace via a pilot study (Keele et al, 2010). The pilot informed minor refinements in the current study and a detailed list of the updated competencies, and their definitions are provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Developmental Assessment Center Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pilot informed minor refinements in the current study and a detailed list of the updated competencies, and their definitions are provided in Table 1. For a detailed explanation of the development of this assessment center see Keele et al (2010) and Sturre et al (2020).…”
Section: Developmental Assessment Center Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%