1993
DOI: 10.1109/59.260834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the transient energy function method for on-line dynamic security analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…was developed (66,67,78). The method was also given other names, such as the exit point method (56,58,68) and the hybrid method (57). This method is built on a theoretical foundation and yet is computationally efficient.…”
Section: Bcu Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…was developed (66,67,78). The method was also given other names, such as the exit point method (56,58,68) and the hybrid method (57). This method is built on a theoretical foundation and yet is computationally efficient.…”
Section: Bcu Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is built on a theoretical foundation and yet is computationally efficient. The practicability and reliability of the BCU method have been evaluated via extensive numerical studies (68). The BCU method is the only direct method adopted by EPRI in its latest version of DIRECT 4.0 (69).…”
Section: Bcu Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid SBS method demands as such more CPU time/step than a conventional SBS method. Furthermore, for practical multimachine systems the times span, that is, length of simulation for both conventional SBS and hybrid SBS methods are the same [5,8]. So in comparing proposed method with the conventional SBS method the latter has been favored regarding its 'on-line' equivalent CPU time considering only the time needed for swing angle computation, that is, 500 seconds and not considering the time needed for deciding stability through plotting and visualization of swing curves.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cpu Timementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another advantage of the BCU method is the ability to provide useful information regarding how to derive preventive control actions when the underlying power system is deemed unstable. A three-year project, sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), has confirmed the practicability and reliability of the BCU method via extensive numerical evaluations [29], [30]. the BCU method is the only direct method adopted by EPRI in its latest version of DIRECT 4.0 [36].…”
Section: Theorem 2: (Static Relationship)mentioning
confidence: 99%