Abstract:Over a 16-year period, 105 patients with pituitary adenoma accompanied by visual disturbance under went transcranial intracapsular removal of the tumor followed by radiotherapy. Postoperative recov ery of visual function in these patients was compared with the results obtained in other institutions after trans-sphenoidal surgery. The severity of preoperative visual impairment was correlated with the duration of visual impairment, the degree of optic atrophy, the extent of suprasellar tumor infil tration, and a… Show more
“…Many preoperative factors have been advocated to influence the postoperative visual outcome. Young age, short preoperative duration of symptoms, small field loss and good acuity were the prognostic factors reported in the literature as associated to a better postoperative visual outcome [5,19,23,24]. Suzukawa [24] reported the optic atrophy and a high degree of suprasellar extension as negative prognostic factors, but this study included pituitary adenomas operated trough transcranial approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Young age, short preoperative duration of symptoms, small field loss and good acuity were the prognostic factors reported in the literature as associated to a better postoperative visual outcome [5,19,23,24]. Suzukawa [24] reported the optic atrophy and a high degree of suprasellar extension as negative prognostic factors, but this study included pituitary adenomas operated trough transcranial approach. A recent study, based on quantitative analysis of the visual field defect, reports that the recovery of the visual field is associated with a shorter duration of symptoms and a smaller preoperative defect in the visual acuity and field.…”
The objective of the study was to evaluate the preoperative visual field defect, the postoperative outcome and the possible prognostic factors in patients with pituitary macroadenoma, using a quantitative method (the mean deviation = MD), and to review the literature. A total of 73 patients, operated trough trans-sphenoidal approach, were selected, and data in single eyes were analysed by calculating the frequency and the degree of postoperative improvement (relative improvement). The visual field defect improved in 95.7% of eyes: The recovery was complete in 48.9% and partial in 46.8%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that factors, independently predictive for complete recovery, were as follows: low preoperative MD absolute value (p = 0.008), low cranio-caudal diameter of tumour (p = 0.02) and young age (p = 0.0001). The mean relative improvement in visual field defect (dMD%) was correlated with the preoperative visual acuity (p = 0.0001) and inversely related with the preoperative MD (p = 0.007) and the age (p = 0.017). The relative improvement was higher in tumours with a smaller cranio-caudal diameter (p = 0.0185). In conclusion, using a quantitative method, we can measure the degree of the postoperative visual field defect improvement. Predictive factors for a complete recovery were good preoperative visual function, young age and low cranio-caudal tumour.
“…Many preoperative factors have been advocated to influence the postoperative visual outcome. Young age, short preoperative duration of symptoms, small field loss and good acuity were the prognostic factors reported in the literature as associated to a better postoperative visual outcome [5,19,23,24]. Suzukawa [24] reported the optic atrophy and a high degree of suprasellar extension as negative prognostic factors, but this study included pituitary adenomas operated trough transcranial approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Young age, short preoperative duration of symptoms, small field loss and good acuity were the prognostic factors reported in the literature as associated to a better postoperative visual outcome [5,19,23,24]. Suzukawa [24] reported the optic atrophy and a high degree of suprasellar extension as negative prognostic factors, but this study included pituitary adenomas operated trough transcranial approach. A recent study, based on quantitative analysis of the visual field defect, reports that the recovery of the visual field is associated with a shorter duration of symptoms and a smaller preoperative defect in the visual acuity and field.…”
The objective of the study was to evaluate the preoperative visual field defect, the postoperative outcome and the possible prognostic factors in patients with pituitary macroadenoma, using a quantitative method (the mean deviation = MD), and to review the literature. A total of 73 patients, operated trough trans-sphenoidal approach, were selected, and data in single eyes were analysed by calculating the frequency and the degree of postoperative improvement (relative improvement). The visual field defect improved in 95.7% of eyes: The recovery was complete in 48.9% and partial in 46.8%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that factors, independently predictive for complete recovery, were as follows: low preoperative MD absolute value (p = 0.008), low cranio-caudal diameter of tumour (p = 0.02) and young age (p = 0.0001). The mean relative improvement in visual field defect (dMD%) was correlated with the preoperative visual acuity (p = 0.0001) and inversely related with the preoperative MD (p = 0.007) and the age (p = 0.017). The relative improvement was higher in tumours with a smaller cranio-caudal diameter (p = 0.0185). In conclusion, using a quantitative method, we can measure the degree of the postoperative visual field defect improvement. Predictive factors for a complete recovery were good preoperative visual function, young age and low cranio-caudal tumour.
“…Since then, investigators have attempted to identify pre-operative characteristics that may predict recovery. Variables such as age, duration of symptoms, tumour size and volume, pre-operative visual acuity (VA) or visual field (VF) loss, optic atrophy and pattern electroretinogram have been explored but none has been able to consistently predict visual recovery following surgery [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Such predictors of visual outcome would be helpful to allow counseling of patients in relation to their ultimate likely visual function as well as tailoring of management strategies regarding the timing of surgery.…”
“…The most likely mechanism is direct manipulative and thermal damage during microsurgery while vasospasm may also play a role [1]. Recent series of patients after neurosurgery for central skull base meningiomas show up to 24% incidence of unfavorable visual outcome [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], while the risk is insignificantly lower for nonmeningiomatous pathology [1,13,14].…”
The aim was to present cortical potentials after intraoperative electrical epidural stimulation of the optic nerve (ON) in individuals with normal preoperative vision. Optic nerve potentials after flash and electrical stimulation were additionally recorded. Contact electrodes on ON and occiput were used for monopolar recording of optic nerve potentials and cortical potentials, respectively. Epidural stimulating electrodes on ON were used to deliver a rectangular current pulse (intensity 0.2-5.0 mA; duration 0.1-0.3 ms; rate 2 Hz), and LED flash goggles were used for flash stimulation. Optic nerve potentials after flash stimulation predominantly consisted of a positive deflection with a latency around 40 ms, followed by a longer-lasting negativity with the peak at around 50 ms. Optic nerve potentials after electrical epidural stimulation of ON were comprised of a negative deflection at around 3 ms. A positive and a negative deflection at 20 and 30 ms, respectively, and a smaller positive deflection at 40 ms constituted cortical potentials after electrical epidural stimulation of ON. Stable and repeatable cortical potentials after electrical epidural stimulation of ON could safely be recorded in humans during neurosurgery. The origin of these presumably far-field potentials and their potential role in intraoperative monitoring remains to be established.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.