2015
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/98/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the toxicity of superfine materials to change the physiological functions of aquatic organisms of different trophic levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The object of the DHC study is free-living (autochthonous) zooplankton and ecosystem functions based on plankton concentration on a certain spatial scale (DHC working volume) but representing the long monitoring series of measurements. Due to the different rate of plankton community interaction with environmental factors [5,6,13,14,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], including the appearance of pollutants, it is possible to use the ecosystem functions that are different in terms of responsiveness.…”
Section: The Bioindication Informativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The object of the DHC study is free-living (autochthonous) zooplankton and ecosystem functions based on plankton concentration on a certain spatial scale (DHC working volume) but representing the long monitoring series of measurements. Due to the different rate of plankton community interaction with environmental factors [5,6,13,14,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], including the appearance of pollutants, it is possible to use the ecosystem functions that are different in terms of responsiveness.…”
Section: The Bioindication Informativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, quite a few studies have been devoted to water biotesting techniques based on the analysis of various features of aquatic organisms, namely survival registration (OECD, 2013(OECD, , 2019, reproducibility, offspring quality, morphological parameter changes (OECD, 2013), physiological functions, and behavioral responses (Lechelt et al, 2000;Morgalev et al, 2015;Nikitin, 2014;Wang et al, 2019). The most promising are the methods of water biomonitoring using behavioral responses of local species of hydrobionts, and primarily bivalves (Sukharenko et al, 2017), branchiopoda (Carreño-León et al, 2014) and copepoda (Lechelt et al, 2000;Pan et al, 2015Pan et al, , 2017Ren et al, 2017), and fish (Ren et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%