2013
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20130171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the theory of mind in autism spectrum disorders with the Strange Stories test

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the theory of mind in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and control individuals by applying the Strange Stories test that was translated and adapted to the Portuguese language. Method: Twenty-eight children with ASD and 56 controls who were all male and aged between 6 and 12 years participated in the study. Results: There were significant differences between the median scores of the groups for each of the 12 stories of the test and for the sum total of all the median scores. The median sco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our ToM results at a group level are consistent with other studies of autism finding a group difference on the ToM-condition in the Frith-Happ e Animations [Abell, Happ e, & Frith, 2000;Castelli, Frith, Happ e, & Frith, 2002;Salter, Seigal, Claxton, Lawrence, & Skuse, 2008] and in the Strange Stories vignettes that assessed mental state inference [Kaland, Callesen, Moller-Nielsen, Mortensen, & Smith, 2008;Spek, Scholte, & Van Berckelaer-Onnes, 2010;Velloso Rde, Duarte, & Schwartzman, 2013;White, Hill, Happ e, & Frith, 2009], as well as with those studies assessing performance across multiple cognitive domains Lai et al, 2012;Lam, 2013;Pellicano et al, 2006]. Despite great diversity in the tasks and methods used, ToM is consistently found to be impaired.…”
Section: Cognitive Universalitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our ToM results at a group level are consistent with other studies of autism finding a group difference on the ToM-condition in the Frith-Happ e Animations [Abell, Happ e, & Frith, 2000;Castelli, Frith, Happ e, & Frith, 2002;Salter, Seigal, Claxton, Lawrence, & Skuse, 2008] and in the Strange Stories vignettes that assessed mental state inference [Kaland, Callesen, Moller-Nielsen, Mortensen, & Smith, 2008;Spek, Scholte, & Van Berckelaer-Onnes, 2010;Velloso Rde, Duarte, & Schwartzman, 2013;White, Hill, Happ e, & Frith, 2009], as well as with those studies assessing performance across multiple cognitive domains Lai et al, 2012;Lam, 2013;Pellicano et al, 2006]. Despite great diversity in the tasks and methods used, ToM is consistently found to be impaired.…”
Section: Cognitive Universalitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Participants describe why they think the event took place, and their responses are coded for use of mentalistic explanations. Researchers have found that children and adolescents with developmental disorders (e.g., autism spectrum disorder) generally perform worse than typically developing controls matched on mental age (Happé, 1994;Jolliffe & Baron-Cohen, 1999;Velloso, Duarte, & Schwartzman, 2013;White, Hill, Happé, & Frith, 2009, but see Senju, Southgate, White, & Frith, 2009 for no differences). Three-to 12-year-olds with profound hearing impairments also demonstrate weaker understanding of sarcasm than matched controls, and even typically developing children fail to perform at ceiling (Peterson, Wellman, & Slaughter, 2012).…”
Section: Further Tests Of Advanced Theory Of Mind In Middle Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously developed ToM tests, such as the False Belief Task, the Appearance-Reality Distinction Task, and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes measure, emphasise understanding of others' emotions and beliefs (Velloso, Duarte, & Schwartzman, 2013); the recently developed ToM tests, such as the Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT), the Assessments of Social Context (ASC), and the Social Interpretations Task (SIT), focus on the practical application of ToM in social contexts (Mazza et al, 2010;Wellman et al, 2011;Wellman & Liu, 2004). We extracted these elements of ToM from the literature and constructed our scale with three subscales: the understanding of beliefs, the understanding of emotions, and the ability to apply these understandings during social interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%