2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the taxonomic status of populations assigned to Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis (Anura, Hylidae, Phyllomedusinae) based on molecular, chromosomal, and morphological approach

Abstract: BackgroundThe taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of the genus Phyllomedusa have been amply discussed. The marked morphological similarities among some species hamper the reliable identification of specimens and may often lead to their incorrect taxonomic classification on the sole basis of morphological traits. Phenotypic variation was observed among populations assigned to either P. azurea or P. hypochondrialis. In order to evaluate whether the variation observed in populations assigned to P. hypochondr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
42
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
8
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among amphibians, different morphotypes within a species have been described and related to intraspecific changes in the timing of development (Collins, Zerba & Sredl, 1993), dietary conditions (Pfennig, 1990), geographical variation (Bruschi et al, 2013), or in response to predators (Kishida & Nishimura, 2005;Van Buskirk, 2017;Touchon & Robertson, 2018). The two morphs of B. riojana occurred simultaneously in the same sites and at the same developmental stages and body sizes, and with the same tooth formula, so, it is unlikely that they represent two different species or that diet or geographical variation may be directing the early appearance of the two morphotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among amphibians, different morphotypes within a species have been described and related to intraspecific changes in the timing of development (Collins, Zerba & Sredl, 1993), dietary conditions (Pfennig, 1990), geographical variation (Bruschi et al, 2013), or in response to predators (Kishida & Nishimura, 2005;Van Buskirk, 2017;Touchon & Robertson, 2018). The two morphs of B. riojana occurred simultaneously in the same sites and at the same developmental stages and body sizes, and with the same tooth formula, so, it is unlikely that they represent two different species or that diet or geographical variation may be directing the early appearance of the two morphotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next we plotted the phylogeny in the morphospace using the 'phylomorphospace' function in R (R Core Team, 2016) implemented in the 'phytools' library (Revell, 2012). We used a consensus phylogeny based on Frost et al (2006), Roelants et al (2007), and Bruschi et al (2013) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Phylogenetic tree representing the relationships among the species included in our study. The tree is a composite tree based on Frost et al (2006), Roelants et al (2007), and Bruschi et al (2013). To the right of the tree are indicated the different locomotor modes and lifestyles of the species.…”
Section: Telencephalonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 19 species of Phyllomedusa cytogenetically analysed, only P . tetraploidea is polyploid [15,28-30]. All of the remaining species are diploid with 26 bi-armed chromosomes, with the exception of P .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most hylids carrying one Ag-NOR [15,35-37], Phyllomedusa species, with some exceptions, generally exhibited multiple sites and variability in the number and location of the Ag-NOR sites has been observed [20,28-30,32-34,38]. At least three of the five known species of the P .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%