2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00382-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Syntactic Annotation in EPEC, the Reference Corpus for the Processing of Basque

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This coefficient provides a good measure of agreement (Artstein and Poesio 2008) as it takes into consideration the agreement by chance along the observed agreement. The Kappa coefficient κ is widely regarded as a measurement of IAA, and has been used by several researchers to evaluate their work, such as the evaluation of the Irish Treebank (Lynn et al 2012), evaluation of Hindi Treebank (Gupta et al 2010), and evaluation of Basque corpus (Uria et al 2009). In addition, it has been used as a measure of annotators' objectivity in different tasks; such as POS annotation (Mieskes and Strube 2006), discourse annotation in the GNOME corpus (Poesio 2004), and word sense disambiguation (Bruce and Wiebe 1998;Véronis 1998).…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coefficient provides a good measure of agreement (Artstein and Poesio 2008) as it takes into consideration the agreement by chance along the observed agreement. The Kappa coefficient κ is widely regarded as a measurement of IAA, and has been used by several researchers to evaluate their work, such as the evaluation of the Irish Treebank (Lynn et al 2012), evaluation of Hindi Treebank (Gupta et al 2010), and evaluation of Basque corpus (Uria et al 2009). In addition, it has been used as a measure of annotators' objectivity in different tasks; such as POS annotation (Mieskes and Strube 2006), discourse annotation in the GNOME corpus (Poesio 2004), and word sense disambiguation (Bruce and Wiebe 1998;Véronis 1998).…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%